Defry Azhari


This research aims to find out the correlation between students’ proficiency and disagreement strategies. The study involved the fourth-semester students of English Education Study Program. The instruments of this research were English language proficiency test to get the data of students’ language proficiency scores and Discourse Completion Task (DCT) to get the data of students’ disagreement statements. The correlation between language proficiency test scores and DCT’s scores was significant with the coefficient correlation (r count ) was 0,264 which was higher than R table 5% (0.235). The coefficient correlation shows that the correlation was positive. However, the strength of correlation was weak. The results implied that there was a correlation between students’ proficiency and disagreement strategies but the language proficiency did not indirectly affect the disagreement strategies of students because the correlation was weak.


Kata Kunci

students’ proficiency; disagreement strategies

Teks Lengkap:



Aijmer, K. (1986). Discourse Variation and Hedging. In J. Aarts, & W. Meijer (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics II. New Studies in the Analysis and Exploitation of Computer Corpora (pp. 1-18). Amsterdam, AMS: Rodopi.

Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. S. (1993). Refining the DCT: Comparing Open Questionnaires and Dialogue Completion Tasks. Paper presented at the 6th Annual Meeting of the International Conference on Pragmatics and Language Learning, Urbana, IL: USA.

Behnam, B., &Niroomand, M. (2011). An Investigation of Iranian EFL Learners' use of politeness strategies and power relations in disagreement across different proficiency. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 204-220. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/profile/Biook_Behnam/publication/

Brinton, L.J. (2000). The Structure of Modern English: A Linguistic Introduction. Amsterdam, AMS: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Brown, P., & Stephen C. L. (1987).Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, CA: Cambridge University Press.

Gay, L.R. (1990). Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Application (3rd ed). United States: Merril Publishing Company.

Jalilifar, A. (2009). Request Strategies: Cross-sectional Study of Iranian EFL Learners and Australian Native Speakers. English Language Teaching Journal, 2(1), 790-803.Retrieved from ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/334/297

Kamisili, S., &Dogancay-Aktuna, S. (1996). Effects of Social Power on Language Use Across Speech Communities. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 199-222. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1996.tb00095.x/pdf.

Kreutel, K. (2007). "I do not agree with you" ESL learners' expression of disagreement. TESL-EJ TOP, 11(3), 1-20. Retrieved from http:dx//.doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1996.tb00095.x

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. Harlow, HOH: Longman.

Locastro, V. (1986). Yes. I agree with you, but...: Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese and American English. Paper presented at the Japan Association of Language Teachers’ International Conference on Language Teaching and Learning at Seiri, Gakuen, Hamamatsu, Japan, November 22-24.1-21, Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED284425.pdf

Locher, M. A. (2004). Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin, BL: Mouton de Gruyter.

Mulkay, M. (1985).Agreement and Disagreement in Conversations and Letters. Text, 5.3, 201-28.

Nakajima, Y. (1997). Politeness Strategies in the Workplace: Which Experiences Help Japanese Businessmen Acquire American English Native-like Strategies? Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 13.1, 49-69.

Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes. In J. M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 57-101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sugiyono. 2014. Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta

Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Xuehua, W. (2006). A Study of Strategy Use in Showing Agreement and Disagreement to Others Opinions. CALEA Journal (Bimonthly), 29 (5), 55-65. Retrieved from www.celea.org.cn/teic/69/69-55.pdf


  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


ISSN: 2579-6038 (Cetak)

ISSN: 2579-6046 (Online)

Flag Counter