Bringing The Poster Presentation Model into Classroom

Ima Widyastuti (Scopus ID 57210281451)(1*)
(1) Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI : 10.30738/sosio.v6i1.6205

Abstract

Making students to speak English in a large classroom becomes a big challenge for teachers. On one hand, there is no enough time for all students speak equally. On the other hand, most students are lack of confidence and English competence. As a result, the students tend to be reluctant toward the speaking activities. There have been many research under the speaking classroom activities, however, modeling professional activity into classrooms has been rare. The recent action research on a Poster Presentation model aims to make students participate in the classroom activities actively by considering their characteristics. From the individual interview and classroom observations of the 17 passive students enrolled on the four Speaking for Academic Purposes classrooms at Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa University, Indonesia, the researchers found that the Poster Presentation model with two rules applied, i.e. no talk no grade and interrelated questions motivated the students’ participation in the speaking classroom activities. However, the Poster Presentation model did not work on those who have never experienced in natural speaking practices before. Thus, managing the classroom using the present model brings double facets among students.

References


Bacon, S. M., & Finnemann, M. . (1990). A study of the attitudes, motives, and strategies of university foreign language students and their disposition to authentic oral and written input. Modern Language Journal, 74, 459–473.

Berwick, R., & Ross, S. (1989). Motivation after Matriculation : Are Japanese Learners of English still Alive after Exam Hell. JALT Journal, 11(92), 193–210.

Brinton, L. J. (2000). The structure of modern English: A linguistic introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Brown, J. D. (1990). Where do test fit into language program? JALT Journal, 12(1), 1–10.

Burns, A. (2003). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Christophel, D. M., & Gorham, J. (1995). A test-retest Analysis of Student Motivation, Teacher Immediacy and Perceived Sources of Motivation and Demotivation in College classes. Communication Education, 44, 292–306.

Coelho, E., Winer, L., & Winn-Bell Olsen, J. (1989). All Sides of the Issue: Activities for Cooperative Jigsaw Groups. Hayward: Alemany Press.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). Flow. London: Rider.

Deci, E.L., and Ryan, R. . (2008). Self-Determination Theory: A Macrotheory of Human Motivation, Development, and Health. Canadian Psychology, 49(2), 182–185.

Dörnyei, Z. (2001a). Teaching and Researching Motivation. England: Pearson Education.

Dörnyei, Z. (2001b). Teaching and Researching Motivation. England: Pearson Education Ltd.

Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fatiha, M., Sliman, B., Mustapha, B., & Yahia, M. (2014). ATTITUDES AND MOTIVATIONS IN LEARNING ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGAUGE. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 7(3), 117–128. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1644634381/fulltextPDF/C3700C7C6BB84314PQ/1?accountid=38628

Fowler, J., & Şaraplı, O. (2010). Classroom management: What ELT students expect. Procedía Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 94–97. Retrieved from www.sciencedirect.com

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1991). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Kemmis, S., & Mc Taggart, R. (1988). The Action Research Planner. Victoria: Deakin University.

Mukminin, A., Sari, S. R., Haryanto, E., Habibi, A., Hidayat, M., & Al, E. (2019). They can speak English, but they don’t want to use it." Teaching Contents through English in a Bilingual School and Policy Recommendations. The Qualitative Report, 24(6), 1258–1274.

Mulder, Y., Lazonder, A., T, de J., Anjewierden, A., & Bollen, L. (2012). Validating and optimizing the effects of model progres-sion in simulation-based inquiry learning. Journal of Sci Ence, Education & Technology, 21(6), 722–729.

Nunan, D. (1999). Speak out. Singapore: International Thomson Asia.

Rijsewijk, L. G. M. van, Oldenburg, B., Snijders, T. A. B., & Dijkstra, Jan Kornelis; Veenstra, R. (2018). A description of classroom help networks, individual network position, and their associations with academic achievement. PLoS One, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208173

Rockwell, S. ., & Singleton, L. . (2007). The Effect of the Modality of Presentation of Streaming Multimedia on Information Acquisition. Media Psychology, 9(1), 179–191.

Willis, J. (1996). A framework for Task-based Learning. Essex: Pearson Education Ltd.

Wu, H., Lee, S., Chang, H., & Liang, J. (2013). Current status,opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computer Education, 62, 41–49.


Article Statistic

Abstract view : 117 times
PDF views : 69 times

The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).

If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.

Alternatively, you can download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link above.

Fullscreen Fullscreen Off

Full Text: PDF

How To Cite This :

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 SOSIOHUMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora