EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TALKING STICK DISERTAI PENEMUAN TERBIMBING TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 11 YOGYAKARTA

Retno Wulandari, Istiqomah Istiqomah

Sari


This research aims at knowing that cooperative learning model type talking stick with discovery learning appoarch is more effective than conventional learning model toward the result of mathematics subject of the students grade VIII SMP Negeri 11 Yogyakarta. This research uses Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. The research has two variables. The independent variable consists of cooperative learning model type talking stick with discovery learning approach and conventional learning model, and the dependent variable is result of mathematics subject. The population was all students grade VIII in SMP N 11 Yogyakarta consisting of 136 students in 4 classes. The research sample of two classes was taken by cluster random sampling technique. Data collection technique uses pretest and posttest. The data analysis uses t-test, in which it was previously tested using pre-requisite test, namely; normality test and homogenity test, and than compares testimated  with ttable, with df = n1 + n2 -2, and α = 5%. If testimated   ttable , then Ho is refused. This means that the average gain score of experiment class is better than the average gain score of control class.Based on the result of estimated gained-score it is known that the value of testimated = 2,351, whereas ttable = 1,671. Because testimated = 2,351 > ttable = 1,671, then Ho is refused. This means that the average gain score of experiment class is better than the average gain score of control class. Therefore, it can be concluded that cooperative learning model type talking stick with discovery learning appoarch is more effective than conventional learning model toward result of math subject of the students grade VIII SMP Negeri 11 Yogyakarta.


Kata Kunci


effectiveness, talking stick, discovery learning and learning result.

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Agus Suprijono. 2012. Cooperative Learning Teori & aplikasi PAIKEM.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Depdiknas.2002. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Erman Suherman dkk.2003. Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: Jurdik Matematika Fakultas Pendidikan MIPA UPI.

Ibrahim & Suparni. 2008. Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika. Yogyakarta: Bidang Akademik UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

Markaban.2006. Model Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan Penemuan Terbimbing. Yogyakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Pusat Pengembangan dan Penataran Guru Matematika.

Miftahul Huda .2013. Model-Model Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Muhammad Thobroni & Arif Mustofa.2013. Belajar dan Pembelajaran Pengembangan Wacana dan Praktik Pembelajaran dalam Pembangunan Nasional. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Nasution.2008. Berbagai Pendekatan Dalam Proses Belajar Dan Mengajar.Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Oemar Hamalik.2006. Proses Belajar Mengajar.Bandung:Bumi Aksara.

Sardiman A.M. 2001. Interaksi & Motivasi Belajar Mengajar.Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sugiyono.2009. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono.2012. Statistika Untuk Penelitian Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suharsimi Arikunto. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Syaiful Bahri Djamarah & Aswan Zain. 2010. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta:Rineka Cipta.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30738/.v3i1.268

Article Metrics

Sari view : 142 times
PDF - 517 times

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


##submission.copyrightStatement##



Lihat Statistik