Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Compton: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika is available for free (open access) to all readers. The journal is related to development and research in Physics Education, Classical Physics, and Modern Physics (theoretical studies, experiments, and its applications)

 

Section Policies

Artikel

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Each manuscript of Compton: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika is then read by an editor (either individually or in consultation) to assess its suitability for the journal according to the guidelines determined by the editorial policy. This is an important step to ensure that (1) the content falls within the scope of the journal, (2) the manuscript follows editorial policy and procedural guidelines, and (3) that it does not contain an unacceptable level of overlap with manuscripts that are already in press. A manuscript could be rejected without additional review for one or more of the previous reasons, and the author notified.

All incoming manuscripts will be checked for authenticity to prevent plagiarism by using plagiarism checker.

All manuscripts submitted to Compton: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika will be read and reviewed double blind peer review (both the authors and the reviewers are unaware of each other's identity) by (minimum) 2 Peer-reviewers who are expert in their field. The acceptance of an article by Editor depends on the novelty of research, significance of the article, truth of the content, the degree of originality, the clarity of description, and the conformity with the objective of the journal

The reviewers return their recommendations and reports to the editor (via the online submission system), who assesses them collectively, and then makes a decision, either on his or her own or in consultation with other editors on whether to reject the article (either outright or with encouragement to resubmit), to withhold judgment pending major or minor revisions, to accept it pending satisfactorily completed revisions, or to accept it as written.

The results of reviewed manuscripts by reviewers will be notified to the author via email. The opportunity to revise the article is given to author based on the reviewers' suggestion (and editor) no later than 4 weeks after the email notification.

Reviewers are required to recuse themselves when the following circumstances arise:

  • The Reviewer is any relationships of an author on the manuscript.
  • The Reviewer is currently employed by, or has his or her principle practice or research site at, the same institution or organization as an author on the manuscript.
  • The Reviewer is involved in ongoing, direct research collaboration with the author, including as a co-investigator or co-author on a different manuscript.
  • The Reviewer has a relationship with a commercial interest that is relevant to the subject matter of the manuscript.
  • The Reviewer has a relationship, not listed above, that would impact his or her ability to provide a fair and objective review.

 

Publication Frequency

Compton: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika is published periodically (twice a year) in June and December which each issue publish 5-7 articles.

 

Open Access Policy

All articles published by Compton: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. This permits anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and adapt the work provided the original work and source is appropriately cited.

 

Article Publication Fees

The authors are not required to pay an article submission, processing, and publication fee.

 

Publication Frequency

Compton: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika is published periodically (twice a year) in June and December which each issue publish 5-7 articles.

 

Anti-plagiarism Policy

All manuscripts submitted to Compton: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika will be checked for authenticity to prevent plagiarism by using Plagiarism Checker.

All incoming manuscripts must be free of plagiarism. It has not been published before and is not presently being considered for publication elsewhere. The author is responsible for the authenticity of the submitted manuscript.

 

Internal Policy

Editorial Board, Peer-reviewers, and Proof of Compton: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika are permitted to submit an article in this journal with the following conditions:

  1. An Compton: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika editorial board is free to publish
  2. The manuscripts must be written by at least 2 authors, preferably from differenbt institution and country
  3. Editors and Peer-reviewers of Compton: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika who submit an article to this journal will be released temporarily from the editorial processes starting from the time of submitting the article. This policy goes into the publication decision of the article (received without revision, received with minor revision, received with major revision, or rejected) at least 1 issue/number.
  4. There is no special treatment for Editors, Peer-reviewers, and Proofreaders of JPFA who submit an article to Compton: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika.

 

Citation Style

The references must be minimum 80% the latest reference that is less than 10 years from scientific journal articles. The Bibliography is written in numeric, font size: 12 pt, and sorted in order of the usage in the article. If possible, a link to the online article must be given in references (e.g., 4, 5, 6, and 9). In the article body, the citation uses square brackets containing the sequence number of the references (for example [1]).References is strongly recommended to use references manager software (e.g., Mendeley, EndNote, or Zotero) with citation style: IEEE

Example

[1]    J. W. Creswell, “Educational research,” Planning, Conduct. Eval. Quant. Qual. Res., 2012.

[2]  M. A. Gaffar, A. Mudrikah, Hamdani, and L. L. Hakim, Alphawave Model: Seni Melatih Berbasis Neuro-linguistic Programming. 2017.

[3]  K. M. Obenchain and S. S. Taylor, “Behavior management making it work in middle and secondary schools,” Clear. House A J. Educ. Strateg. Issues Ideas, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 7–11, 2005.

[4]  L. L. Hakim, E. Cahya, E. Nurlaelah, and Z. W. Lestari, “The Application EQ And SQ in Learning Mathematics with Brain-Based Learning Approach to Improve Students’ Mathematical Connection and Self-Efficacy in Senior High School,” PEOPLE Int. J. Soc. Sci., 2015.

[5]  L. L. Hakim and R. Yanuarsari, “Use of Educative Teaching Aids in Improving Logical-Mathematical Intelligence for Early Childhood,” in Ahmad Dahlan International Conference on Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 2017.

[6]  M. A. Gaffar, S. M. R. Noval, Hamdani, and L. L. Hakim, Alpha Resilence: Mengembangkan Resiliensi Diri Melalui Gelombang Otak Alpha. 2018.

[7]  R. McCraty, M. Atkinson, W. A. Tiller, G. Rein, and A. D. Watkins, “The effects of emotions on short-term power spectrum analysis of heart rate variability,” Am. J. Cardiol., vol. 76, no. 14, pp. 1089–1093, 1995.

[8]  D. Goleman, “Emotional Intelligence. Why It Can Matter More than IQ.,” Learning, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 49–50, 1996.

[9]  F. Dolcos, A. D. Iordan, and S. Dolcos, “Neural correlates of emotion–cognition interactions: A review of evidence from brain imaging investigations,” J. Cogn. Psychol., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 669–694, 2011.

[10]  A. R. Damasio, “Descartes’ error: Emotion, rationality and the human brain,” 1994.

[11]  A. D. Martin, “Emotional quality management,” Jakarta Arga, 2003.

 

Copyright Notice

The copyright in this website and the material on this website (including without limitation the text, computer code, artwork, photographs, images, music, audio material, video material and audio-visual material on this website) is owned by Compton: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika and its licensors.

All articles published by Compton: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. This permits anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and adapt the work provided the original work and source is appropriately cited.

 

Publications Ethic

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

COMPTON: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika is a peer-reviewed electronic international journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed of COMPTON: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.

Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa as publisher of COMPTON: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Physics Education Department and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

 

Publication decisions

The editor of the COMPTON: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

 

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

 

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.