The importance of grammar in SMA English textbooks in Indonesia to promote students’ linguistic competence


  • Silvester Goridus Sukur Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia



textbook, grammar-oriented material, linguistic competence


This research aims to analyze how far the English textbooks that were written based on the 2013 Curriculum for Senior High School (SMA) learners in Indonesia have developed grammar-related material for students to improve their grammatical competence for their needs in English communication. This research is a qualitative content analysis of the English textbooks for SMA students conducted in Yogyakarta Special Territory from July to December 2020. The data for this research were gathered from three English textbooks for SMA students: Bahasa Inggris X, Bahasa Ingris XI, and Bahasa Inggris XII. These three books were provided by the Government of Indonesia for SMA learners in Indonesia. The data obtained from these data sources were processed with NVivo R1 Software before being further analysed. Kappa Statistics reliability test was employed for the data reliability agreement level with the result of >0.75, categorized as excellent. The findings of this research reveal that the three selected English textbooks were not well developed in terms of grammar-oriented materials to promote their linguistic competence as one of the components in developing their English communicative competence. It is suggested that the grammatical-competence materials in the three textbooks are provided in a balanced way.


Download data is not yet available.


Bahar, H. B. & Zaman, B. (2013). Significance of textbook evaluation for the purpose of effective second language acquisition. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 12, Issue 5 (Jul. - Aug. 2013), PP 70-77

Bazeley, P. & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. (2nd Ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Berezenko, V., Cherkhava, O., & Musiienko, Y. (2022). Communicative Language Teaching Approach in Promoting the Linguistic Competence of Efl Learners. Advanced Education, 20, 88–96.

Caingcoy, M. E. (2022). Role of Instructor Qualifications, Assessment and Pedagogical Practices in EFL Students’ Grammar and Writing Proficiency. Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices.

Celce-Murcia, M. (2007). Rethinking the role of communicative competence in language teaching. In E. A. Soler & M. P. S. Jorda (Eds.), Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning (pp 41-57). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Celce-Murcia, M. (1995). Communicative Competence: A Pedagogically Motivated Model with Content Specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 5–35.

Chelimsky, E. (1989). Content analysis: A methodology for structuring and analyzing written material. Retrieved from

Croker, R. A. (2009). Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford: Macmillan Publishers Limited.

Drisko, J. W. & Maschi, T. (2016). Content analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

Fauzan, A., Basthomi, Y., & Ivone, F. M. (2022). Effects of Using Online Corpus and Online Dictionary as Data-driven Learning on Students’ Grammar Mastery. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 679–704.

Fazio, X., & Gallagher, T. L. (2014). Morphological development levels of science content vocabulary: implications for science-based texts in elementary classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 1407–1423.

Fleiss et al. (2003). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Hassan, A., Kasan, R. A., Alawawda, M., & Soliman, R. A. (2022). Metalinguistic reflective beliefs of Saudi EFL teachers in the content of grammar teaching and learning: A cross-sectional survey. Journal of Language & Linguistics Studies, 18(1), 530–542. Retrieved from

Ho, P. V. P., & Binh, N. T. (2014). The effects of communicative grammar teaching on students’ achievement of grammatical knowledge and oral production. English Language Teaching, 7(6), 74–86.

Hutchinson, T. & Torres, E. (1994).The textbook as agent of change. EL T Journal Volume 48/4 October 1994 © Oxford University Press.

Kotlovskiy, A., Mykytenko, N., Onufriv, A., & Salamakha, M. (2020). Language Portfolio for Building Linguistic Competence in Esp Speaking in Students’ Independent Work. Advanced Education, 7(15), 20–24.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage Publications, Inc.

Lewis, M. & Hill, J. (1992). Practical techniques for language teaching. Croatia: Thomson Heinle.

Lin, C. Y., Cheng, C., & Wang, M. (2018). The contribution of phonological and morphological awareness in Chinese–English bilingual reading acquisition. Reading and Writing, 31(1), 99–132.

Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40(3), 243–249.

Littlewood, W. (2011). Communicative Language Teaching: An Expanding Concept for a Changing World. In Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. New York: Routledge.

Luo, Y. C., Koh, P. W., Deacon, S. H., & Chen, X. (2018). The roles of metalinguistic skills in Chinese–English biliteracy development. Reading and Writing, 31(8), 1721–1740.

Madya, S. (2013). Metodologi pengajaran bahasa: dari era prametode sampai era pascametode. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.

Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Retrieved from on

Muhammed, A. C. P., Prakash, J., & Sindhu, H. (2018). Developing Esl/ Efl Learners’ Grammatical Competence through Communicative Activities. I-Manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 8(1), 63.

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.) London: Pearson Education Limited

Ray, A. (2018). Grammar in Project-Based Language Teaching: a Case Analysis. I-Manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 8(1), 56.

Richards, J.C. & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.). London: Pearson Education Limited.

Richards, J. & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2002). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). The USA: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: forward, central & backward design. RELC Journal, 44 (1), 5–33.

Richards, J. C. & Willy A. R. (2002). Methodology in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rose, S., Spinks, N. & Canhoto, A. I. (2015). Management research: Applying the principles. New York: Routledge.

Rossiter, A. (2021). The Importance of Grammar. Online Submission. Retrieved from

Strazny, P. (2005) (Ed.). Encyclopedia of linguistics, volume 1. New York: Taylor & Francis Books, Inc.

Xiao, W. yan, Wang, M. wen, Weng, Z., Zhang, L. lin, & Zuo, J. li. (2017). Corpus-based research on English word recognition rates in primary school and word selection strategy. Frontiers of Information Technology and Electronic Engineering, 18(3), 362–372.

Yeung, S. S. S., Siegel, L. S., & Chan, C. K. K. (2013). Effects of a phonological awareness program on English reading and spelling among Hong Kong Chinese ESL children. Reading and Writing, 26(5), 681–704.

Zhang, H., & Koda, K. (2018). Vocabulary knowledge and morphological awareness in Chinese as a heritage language (CHL) reading comprehension ability. Reading and Writing, 31(1), 53–74.

Zohrabi, M. (2011). Coursebook Development and Evaluation for English for General Purposes Course. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 213.




How to Cite

Sukur, S. G. (2021). The importance of grammar in SMA English textbooks in Indonesia to promote students’ linguistic competence. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 4(1), 96–104.




Citation Check