The effectiveness of small group discussion in writing report text

Authors

  • Ika Purnama Sari STIKOM Tunas Bangsa Pematangsiantar, Indonesia
  • Epi Supriyani Siregar Universitas Pembinaan Masyarakat Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Roslaini Roslaini Universitas Muhammadyah Prof Dr Hamka, Indonesia
  • Ariyani Muljo Institut Agama Islam Negeri Langsa, Indonesia
  • Eri Ester Khairas Politeknik Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Ari Setiawan Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36597/jelp.v7i1.16302

Keywords:

Small Group Discussion, Writing, Report Text

Abstract

Lack of interest in writing individually by students makes writing activity as one of the four language skills pay less attention to the students. Creating small Group Discussion is one method that can help students improve their learning achievement, especially in improving their writings. This research was intended to know the effectiveness of Small Group Discussion Technique on students’ achievement in writing report text at Madrasah Aliyah Negeri (MAN) Pematang Siantar. The populations of this research were 38 eleventh class students of Madrasah Aliyah Negeri (MAN) Pematang Siantar. The samples of this research were taken from 38 students (XI IPA 1).). The students’ achievement was measured l the students’ writing through pretest and posttest. The data were analyzed by using SPSS program. The pretest result shows the means score is 60.13 with the highest score is 70 and the lowest score is 50, while the post test result shows the means score is 60.13 with the highest score is 70 and the lowest score is 50. As the T-Test result, the significant value of Small Group Discussion  is 0.000 <0.05. The different scores between the Pre Test and the Post Test, and the T-test results show that there are differences between scores before and after Small Group Discussion technique were applied to the students. That means there is the effectiveness of Small Group Discussion on student’s achievement in writing Report Text

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, K., & Nurma, S. (2020). Penerapan metode small group discussion terhadap motivasi belajar siswa. CIVICUS: Pendidikan-Penelitian-Pengabdian Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 8(1), 30–35.

Arwidiyarti, D., & Wibawa, B. (2022). Electronic problem-based learning with collassion learning. Journal of Islamic, 7(46).

Becker, A. P. (2011). Building evidence for the evaluation of English learners’ writing scores. Northern Arizona University.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by practices: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York: Longman.

Ferrance, E. (2000). Themes in education: Action research. Brown University: Educational Alliance, 34(1), 1–33.

Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar. Citeseer.

Goldstein, B. J., & Müller-Wieland, D. (2016). Type 2 diabetes: principles and practice. CRC Press.

Guntur, T. H. (2008). Menulis sebagai suatu keterampilan berbahasa. Angkasa: Bandung.

Haidir, H., & Salim, S. (2014). Strategi pembelajaran (Suatu pendekatan bagaimana meningkatkan kegiatan belajar siswa secara trasnformatif).

Hasibuan, J. J., & Moedjiono. (1995). Proses belajar mengajar. Penerbit PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Hughey, J. B. (1983). Teaching ESL composition: Principles and techniques. Newbury House Pub.

Hussain, S. S. (2019). Strategies for teaching academic writing to Saudi L2 learners. English Language Teaching, 12(12), 1–11.

Jayadi, L. (2021). Strategy in teaching writing in online teaching: A case study of SMA Taman Madya Ibu Pawiyatan Yogyakarta. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 4(1), 29–39.

Johanna, A., Avinash, B., & Bevoor, B. (2023). Small group discussion method to increase learning activity: its implementation in education. International Journal of Educational Narratives, 1(1), 18–22.

Khairani, Y. (2012). Improving students’achievement in writing report text through numbered heads together. REGISTER: Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed, 1(1).

Kosasih, E. (2014). Strategi belajar dan pembelajaran implementasi kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Yrama Widya, 170.

McTaggart, R., & Kemmis, S. (1988). The action research planner. Deakin university.

Nurgiyantoro, B. (2010). Penilaian pembelajaran sastra berbasis kompetensi. Yogyakarta: BPFe.

Retnary, I. W. (2021). Enacting collaborative writing in an academic writing class. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 4(2), 25–34.

Slavin, R. S. (2011). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Indeks.

Shah, B. J., Portnoy, B., Chang, D., & Napp, M. (2021). Just culture for medical students: understanding response to providers in adverse events. MedEdPORTAL, 17, 11167.

Susanto, K. P. (2022). The implementation of small group discussion method in writing descriptive text for tenth grade of Walisongo Senior High School Pecangaan Jepara Academic Year 2020/2021. IAIN KUDUS.

Tabrizi, A., Pourfeizi, H. H., Aslani, H., Elmi, A., Tolouei, F. M., Taleb, H., & Rikhtegar, R. (2016). Effect of small group discussion in residency education versus conventional education. Research and Development in Medical Education, 5(1), 47–49.

Yi, J. (2009). Defining writing ability for classroom writing assessment in high schools. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 53–69.

Zidan, A. A. (2020). Writing competence of junior high school students at two junior high schools in Yogyakarta. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 3(1), 69–80.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-17

How to Cite

Sari, I. P., Siregar, E. S., Roslaini, R., Muljo, A., Khairas, E. E., & Setiawan, A. (2024). The effectiveness of small group discussion in writing report text. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.36597/jelp.v7i1.16302

Issue

Section

Artikel

Citation Check