English textbooks evaluation for the seventh grade

Authors

  • Diba Ratu Vidari Jannah Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa
  • Rr. Hasti Robiasih Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36597/jelp.v2i1.3749

Keywords:

Cunningsworth’s criteria, evaluation, textbooks, 2013 Curriculum

Abstract

The objective of this study are to: (1) find out whether the English textbooks of Mandiri and Solatif for seventh grade have fulfilled the criteria of good textbook, (2) reveal the suitability of the two textbooks with the 2013 Curriculum. This research was conducted using evaluation research. The design was employed to obtain information about the conformity between the basic competences in syllabus of 2013 Curriculum with the materials in the English textbooks and also between the criteria of a good textbook by Cunningsworth with the English textbooks. In this study, two English textbooks; Mandiri and Solatif for seventh grade of junior high school were taken to be analyzed. The results showed that Solatif meets three criteria of a good textbook by Cunningsworth. They are aim and approaches, topics, and methodology. It is partly suitable with four categories: design and organization, language content, skills, and political consideration. However it fails to meet one criterion, which is teacher’s book. Mandiri meets none of the criteria of a good textbook by Cunningsworth. It is partly suitable in seven criteria which are aims and approaches, design and organization, language content, skills, topics, methodology, and political consideration. It fails to meet one criterion; teacher’s book. Based on the data got from the conformity of Solatif with the 2013 Curriculum, it can be summarized that the materials in Solatif covers eight KDs for the seventh grade of junior high school, meaning that it accommodates all what is needed by the students for seventh grade of junior high school. Mandiri. It covers seven KDs for the seventh grade of junior high school. Unfortunately, it does not cover one of the last KD.

References

AbdelWahab, M. M. (2013). Developing an English language textbook evaluative checklist. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1(3), 55-70.

Ahmad, D. (2014). Understanding the 2013 curriculum of English teaching through the teachers‟ and policymakers‟ perspectives. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Educational Development (IJERED), 2(4), 6-15.

Bacon, S. M. (1992). The relationship between gender, comprehension, processing strategies, and cognitive and affective response in foreign language listening. The modern language Journal, 76(2), 160-178.

Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan (BSNP). (2006). Kurikulum 2006. Jakarta: Media Makmur Maju Mandiri

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (fifth edition). New York: Pearson Longman.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.

Cunningsworth, A. (1995).Choosing your coursebook. London: Oxford Heinemann Publishers.

Doll, R. (1996). Curriculum improvement: Decision making and process. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.

Fraenkel, J. R & Wallen, N E. (2007). How to design and evaluate research. USA: Mc. Fraw-Hill Inc.

Graves, K. (2000). Designing language courses. Canada: Newbury House.

Hornby, A. S. (2005). Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Instrumen Penilaian I Buku Teks pelajaran Bahasa Inggris SMP/MTS (Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan, Kementrian Pendidikan nasional, 2006).

Mansyurah, S. (2016). A content analysis of English Textbook “When English rings a bell†used in first grade junior high school based on curriculum 2013. Skripsi of English education at Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teachers’ Training of Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta, 2016.

Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: William Morrow.

Pratt, D. (1994). Curriculum planning: A handbook for professionals. Toronto: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, Toronto.

Richards, J. (2001). The role of textbooks in a language program. retrieved on Thursday, 16 November 2017. http://aaboori.mshdiau.ac.ir/FavouriteSubjects/role-of-textbooks.pdf

Richards, J. (2015). The Role of Textbook in a Language Program. Retrieved from http//www.professorjackrichards.com/pdfs/role-of-textbook.pdf

Scollon, R. (2004). Teaching language and culture as hegemonic practice. Modern Language Journal, 88, 271-274.

Setiawati, D. (2015). Content analysis of student book “When English rings a bell†for grade VIII junior high school. Final Project. English Department. Faculty of Languages and Arts. Semarang State University. https://lib.unnes.ac.id/22640/1/2201411107.pdf

Tarigan, H.G. (1986). Telaah buku teks bahasa Indonesia. Bandung: Penerbit Angkasa.

Wen-Cheng, W., Chien-Hung, L., & Chung-Chieh, L. (2011). Thinking of the Textbook in the ESL/EFL Classroom. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 91-96.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-07

Issue

Section

Artikel