Developing supplementary reading materials for tenth-graders of English language and literature program

Authors

  • Agustin Susilowati Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa; SMAN 11 Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Hasti Robiasih Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36597/jelp.v4i1.7916

Keywords:

English language and literature program, Supplementary reading materials, Task Based Instruction

Abstract

The objectives of this study were (1) to develop supplementary reading material for grade X students of English Language and Literature program (ELLP) and (2) to describe the efficacy of the developed supplementary reading material. This research was categorized as Educational Research and Development (R&D) and it employed six steps among the ten proposed by Borg and Gall's model (1983). Those were (1) conducting need analysis, (2) constructing the course grid, (3) developing the first draft of the material (4) getting the expert judgment, (5) revising and writing the final draft of the material, and (6) conducting field testing. The instruments used in this research were questionnaires and interview guidelines. Two types of questionnaires were used to collect the data. The first questionnaire used to obtain the data for the needs analysis was administered to grade X students of ELLP of SMAN 11 Yogyakarta. The second questionnaire used to obtain the data about the appropriateness of the materials was administered to the experts. The materials were designed and based on the frame work proposed by Task Based Instruction (Willis, 1996). The findings showed 1) the development of supplementary reading materials was to fulfill the students' need; the result of need analysis was used to develop the reading materials (2) the efficacy of the developed supplementary reading material helped students to enhance their reading comprehension skills and to achieve the goal of learning reading. Based on the expert judgment, the mean score of all aspects of the two developed units, in the scales of 1-4 was 3.93 which was in the range of 3.50 < x ≤ 4.00 and could be categorized as Very Good. It can attract students to be actively involved in the teaching and learning process. Furthermore, it provides additional learning resource for students to learn reading.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Agustin Susilowati, Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa; SMAN 11 Yogyakarta

Agustin Susilowati is a master student of English Education Department at Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Yogyakarta - Indonesia and English teacher at SMAN 11 Yogyakarta - Indonesia. She focuses her research on English language teaching and literature. She can be contacted at susilowatiagustin2@gmail.com.

Hasti Robiasih, Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa

Hasti Robiasih is a full-time senior English lecturer at Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Yogyakarta - Indonesia. Her research interests cover second language acquisition (SLA) and discourse analysis. She can be contacted at hasti@ustjogja.ac.id.

References

Anderson, N. J. (2003). “Readingâ€. Practical English Language Teaching. Ed. D. Nunan. New York: McGraw Hill. 67-86.

Alyousef, H. S. (2005). Teaching Reading Comprehension to ESL/EFL Learners. Journal of Language and Learning Volume 5 Number 1 2006.

Alvermann, D. E. & Montero, M. K. (2003). Literacy and Reading. In Encyclopedia of Education (Vol. 4, pp. 1513-1518). New York: Macmillan.

Armbruster, B. B., Lehr, F., & Osborn, J. (2001). Put Reading First: The research building blocks for teaching children to read: Kindergarten through grade 3. Washington, DC: CIERA

Hasil PPDB SMA DIY tahun 2019 retrieved from https://arsip.siap-ppdb.com/2019/yogyaprov/#/030001/statistik/32045712

Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan (BSNP). 2014. Penilaian Buku Teks Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jakarta: Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Brown, H.D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.

Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1998). What Reading Does for the Mind. American Educator, 22(1-2), 8-15. Retrieved from https://www.aft.org/ournews/periodicals/american-educator.

Erfiani N N, Ngadiso, Suparno (2019). Developing Supplementary Reading Materials for Grade 11 Students at a Multimedia Study Program. Retrieved from jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id › SiELE › article

Ellis, R. 2010. “The Methodology of Task-Based Teachingâ€. Retrieved from http://asian-efljournal. com/4101/quarterly-journal/2009/12/the-methodology-of-taskbased-teaching-2/

Frost, R. (2006, December 4). A Task-based Approach. British Council Teaching English. Retrieved from, http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/think/methodology/task_based.shtml

Graves, Kathleen. (2000). Designing Language Courses: A guide for teachers. Boston: Heinle&Henle Publishing.

Harmer, Jeremy. (1991). The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Longman Group Ltd

Hutchinson, T. & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Johnson, A. P. (2008). Teaching Reading and Writing: A Guidebook for Tutoring and Remediating Students. Estofer Road, Playmouth: Rowman & Littlefield Education.

Jolly, D. & Bolitho, R. (1998). A framework of materials writing. In Tomlinson,Brian (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (90-115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Long, M. 1985. A Role for Instruction in Second Language Acquisition: Task-Based Language Teaching. Retrived from www.books.google.co.id

McGrath, I. 2013. Teaching Materials and the Roles of EFL/ESL Teachers: Practice and Theory. India: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

Moreillon, J. (2007). Collaborative Strategies for Teaching Reading Comprehension: Maximizing Your Impact. Chicago: ALA Editions.

Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology: A text book for teachers. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.

Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, D. (2010). Task-based Approach to Materials Development. Advances in Language and Literary Studies. Vol 1 (2). 153

Permendikbud_Tahun 2016_Nomor 024_Lampiran_52. Retrieved from https://ktuser.org/files/show/2193

Richards, J.C.(2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching Cambridge:Cambridge university press.

Richard, Jack & Rodgers T. (2001). Approaches and Methods in language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sloat, E. A., Beswick, J. F., & Willms, D. J. (2007). Using Early Literacy Monitoring to Prevent Reading Failure. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(7), 523-529. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com.

Suharto, G. (2006). Pengukuran dan Penilaian Hasil Belajar Bahasa Inggris. Yogyakarta: Pusat Pelayanan dan Pengembangan Bahasa.

Tomlinson, B. (1998). Materials Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tomlinson, B. (2012). Developing Materials for Language Learning and Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Willis, Jane. 1996. A Framework for Task-Based Learning. Singapore: Longman

Downloads

Published

2021-06-10

How to Cite

Agustin Susilowati, & Hasti Robiasih. (2021). Developing supplementary reading materials for tenth-graders of English language and literature program. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 4(1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.36597/jelp.v4i1.7916

Issue

Section

Artikel

Citation Check

Most read articles by the same author(s)