The process of 21st-century English learning at an international primary school in Cirebon

Authors

  • Ika Maratus Sholikha IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, Indonesia
  • Farouk Imam Arrasyid IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, Indonesia
  • Wakhid Nashruddin IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36597/jelp.v5i1.9389

Keywords:

Characteristics, strategies, process 21st century

Abstract

In the 21st century of the fourth industrial revolution, global access and disruptive technology need to develop learners to acquire 21st-century skills that rely on communications, collaboration, creativity, critical thinking teaching strategy, learning process, classroom management, and assessment of paramount importance. The content analysis used the qualitative narrative. The findings allowed students to survive and function with the rapidly evolved, global, and complex world, whilst teachers and other education practitioners were suggested to reform and reconsider the instructional practices including, among others learning materials used in the classroom that aligned with the current situation by involving 2 English teachers and 17 students. Hence, this study investigated characteristics of the 21st-century for EFL Learning, the strategies used by English teachers in teaching English, and the process of students learning in the 21st   century at the international level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bunge, S. A., & Zelazo, P. D. (2006). A brain-based account of the development of rule use in childhood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(3), 118–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00419.x

Chen, H.-R., & Tseng, H.-F. (2012). Factors that influence acceptance of web-based e-learning systems for the in-service education of junior high school teachers in Taiwan. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35(3), 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.11.007

Doebel, S., & Munakata, Y. (2018). Group influences on engaging self-control: Children delay gratification and value it more when their in-group delays and their out-group doesn’t. Psychological Science, 29(5), 738–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617747367

Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. University of Illinois, 2(4), 1–8.

Farista, D. N. R. (2018). Strategi pengelolaan stres guru wanita berstatus guru tetap yayasan sekolah dasar bersistem full day School. Ilmu Pendidikan: Jurnal Kajian Teori Dan Praktik Kependidikan, 3(1), 31–39. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jktpk/article/view/4505

Goerdt, E. (2017). Using a language and literacy intervention to increase autistic students’ social interactions with peers [Nortwestern College]. https://nwcommons.nwciowa.edu/education_masters/51/

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.

Lin, M.-H., Chen, H., & Liu, K.-S. (2017). A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcome. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00744a

McTigue, E. M., Solheim, O. J., Zimmer, W. K., & Uppstad, P. H. (2020). Critically Reviewing GraphoGame Across the World: Recommendations and Cautions for Research and Implementation of Computer‐Assisted Instruction for Word‐Reading Acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(1), 45–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.256

Moll, H. (2020). How young children learn from others. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 54(2), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12417

Putra, N. (2012). Research & development penelitian dan pengembangan: Suatu pengantar. Rajawali Pers.

Rosário, P., Núñez, J. C., Vallejo, G., Cunha, J., Nunes, T., Suárez, N., Fuentes, S., & Moreira, T. (2015). The effects of teachers’ homework follow-up practices on students’ EFL performance: a randomized-group design. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01528

Sabatini, J. P., Halderman, L. K., O’Reilly, T., & Weeks, J. P. (2016). Assessing comprehension in kindergarten through third grade. Topics in Language Disorders, 36(4), 334–355. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000104

Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2020). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Siswono, T. Y. E. (2016). Proses berpikir kreatif siswa dalam memecahkan dan mengajukan masalah matematika. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.17977/jip.v15i1.13

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R & D. Alfabeta.

Tabachuk, N. P., Ledovskikh, I. A., Nadezhda, A., Karpova, I. V, Kazinets, V. A., & Polichka, A. E. (2018). Information competency and creative initiative of personality and their manifestation in activity. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(1), 168–186. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jsser/issue/37945/438324

Downloads

Published

2022-06-21

How to Cite

Sholikha, I. M. ., Arrasyid , F. I. ., & Nashruddin, W. . (2022). The process of 21st-century English learning at an international primary school in Cirebon. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 5(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.36597/jelp.v5i1.9389

Issue

Section

Artikel

Citation Check