Reliability and Validity of the Digital Goniometry to Determining Active Shoulder Range of Motion in Occupational Therapy Contextual Learning Strategy Using Digital Technology

Authors

  • Muhammad Hidayat Sahid Occupational Therapy Departement University of Indonesia
  • Andriani Pratiwi Occupational Therapy Departement University of Indonesia
  • cacha Afradisa Occupational Therapy Departement University of Indonesia
  • Fanza F. Ajjauza Occupational Therapy Departement University of Indonesia

Keywords:

Goniometry, smartphone app, shoulder flexion, shoulder, range of motion

Abstract

Smartphones have become a very important thing in the digitaly year. Their function not only for communication tool but also as a lot of another function as their value add such as a healthcare tool to helping professional healthcare to measure range of motion of human body movement. G-Pro is one of digitaly goniometric application for helping healthcare professional to measure the range of motion of upper and lower extremity. Occupational therapy students in University of Indonesia using this technology to learning how to measure the range of motion of human body, but actually there is no research about validity and reliability of this tool in Indonesia. The purpose of this research is to analyze the reliability and validity of a G-Pro app as compared with traditional goniometry. 21 subjects of occupational therapy students in University of Indonesia, in 2018 had 4 measurements of their degree of shoulder extension for a randomly chosen shoulder position: 2 by universal goniometry (UG) and 2 by the Goniometer-Pro (G-Pro) application. A different evaluator made each measurement. The difference between mean intra-group values was 3,148º (±2,669º) and 2,476º (±2,638º) for G-Pro. The difference between the mean intra-group values was 5.45º. Inter-observer consistency for UG was 0,990 and 0,993 for G- Pro; As regards validity, the values obtained were 0,976 for UG and 0,992 for G-Pro. The Goniometer-Pro app seems to be a reliable and accurate tool for determining the values of shoulder extension. The values obtained are slightly more accurate than those of traditional goniometry. This study intend to promote the use of apps of systemic form in the health system, as a component integrated into the management of the health. This work not only compares the reliability of two methods of measurement, compare the reliability or validity with a gold standard, as it is the radiological measurement.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Hidayat Sahid, Occupational Therapy Departement University of Indonesia

Occupational Therapy Departement
University of Indonesia

Andriani Pratiwi, Occupational Therapy Departement University of Indonesia

Occupational Therapy Departement
University of Indonesia

cacha Afradisa, Occupational Therapy Departement University of Indonesia

Occupational Therapy Departement
University of Indonesia

Fanza F. Ajjauza, Occupational Therapy Departement University of Indonesia

Occupational Therapy Departement
University of Indonesia

References

Gajdosik, R., Bohannon, R. Clinical measurement of range of motion: Review of goniomtery emphasizing reliabilty and validity. Physical Therapy. 1987;67(12):1867-72.

Nawoczenski, D.A., Baumhauer, J.F., Umberger, B.R. Relationship between clinical measurements and motion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint during gait. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81(3):370-6.

Biedert, R.M., Warnke, K. Correlation between the Q angle and the patella position: a clinical and axial computed tomography evaluation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2001; 121(6):346-9.

Kailas, A., Chong, C.C., WatanabeM F. From mobile phones to personal wellness dashboards. IEEE Pulse. 2010;1(1):57-63.

Free, C., Phillips, G., Galli, L., Watson, L., Felix, L., Edwards, P., Patel, V., Haines, A. The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2013;10(1):e1001362.

Koehler, N., Vujovic, O., McMenamin, C. Are individuals more accepting of the internet than mobile phone applications being used in clinical practice?. J Mob Technol Med. 2013;2(1):14-21.

Milani, P., Coccetta, C.A., Rabini, A., Sciarra, T., Massazza, G., Ferriero, G. Mobile Smartphone applications for body position measurement in rehabilitation: a review of goniometric tools. PM&R. 2014;6(11):1038-43.

Kim, T.S., Park, D.D., Lee, Y.B., Han, D.G., Shim, J.S., Lee, Y.J., Kim, P.C. A study on the measurement of wrist motion range using the iPhone 4 gyroscope application. Ann Plast Surg 2014;73(2):215-8.

Norkin, C.C., White, D.J. 2005. Goniometria: evaluación de la movilidad articular. Madrid: Marban Libros.

The app Intelligence. Report on the 50 top Spanish- language health-based apps, 2014.

Jones, A., Sealey, R., Crowe, M., Gordon, S. Concurrent validity and reliability of the simple goniometer iPhone app compared with Universal Goniometer. Physiother Theory Pract. 2014;30(7):512-6.

Ockendon, M., Gilbert, R.E. Validation of a novel smartphone accelerometer-based knee goniometer. J Knee Surg. 2012;25(4):341-5.

Ferretti, A., Valeo, L., Mazza, D., Muliere, L., Iorio, P., Giovannetti, G., Conteduca, F., Iorio, R. Smartphone versus knee ligament arthrometer when size does not matter. Int Orthop. 2014;38(10):2197-9.

Kuegler, P., Wurzer, P., Tuca, A., Sendlhofer, G., Lumenta, D.B., Giretzlehner, M., Kamolz, L.P. Goniometer-apps in hand surgery and their applicability in daily clinical practice. Safety in Health, 2015;1:11.

Werner, B.C., Holzgrefe, R.E., Griffin, J.W., Lyons, M.L., Cosgrove, C.T., Hart, J.M., Brockmeier, S.F. Validation of an innovative method of shoulder range-of- motion measurement using a smartphone clinometer application. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Nov;23(11):e275-82.

Johnson, L.B., Sumner, S., Duong, T., Yan, P., Bajcsy, R., Abresch, R.T., de Bie, E., Han, J.J. Validity and reliability of smartphone magnetometer-based goniometer evaluation of shoulder abduction: A pilot study. Man Ther. 2015;20(6):777-82.

Downloads

Published

2019-10-05