Pembelajaran Dengan Quantitative Reasoning Pemecahan Masalah Pada Mata Kuliah Teori Bilangan

Authors

  • Fetty Nuritasari Universitas Madura, Indonesia
  • Devie Reztia Anjarani Universitas Madura, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30738/indomath.v2i1.3348

Keywords:

Quantitative Reasoning, Problem Solving, Number Theory

Abstract

The objectives of the study: 1. examine questions related to Quantitative Reasoning; 2. It is expected that questions related to Quantitative Reasoning can be given and trained to students. The indicators show a student have problem solving skills are: 1. Understanding the problem; 2. Determine the right settlement strategy; 3. Implement the chosen strategy; 4. Determine the solution to the problem; 5. Checking the accuracy of the strategy and the correctness of the solutions. The results showed that students with upper, middle and lower ability at the stage of problem solving were described by gathering information obtained from the questions. In the upper subject, it works quite well. This is due to the functioning of the Quantitative Reasoning component in solving problems.. Whereas in the lower subject, it also occurs incomplete. This is due to the malfunctioning component of information reception.

References

Adi Widodo, S., Turmudi, T., Afgani Dahlan, J., Istiqomah, I., & Saputro, H. (2018, July). Mathematical Comic Media For Problem Solving Skills. In Proceedings of the Joint Workshop KO2PI and the 1st International Conference on Advance & Scientific Innovation (pp. 101-108). ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering).

American Mathematical Association of Two-Years Colleges. (1995). Crossroads in mathematics: Standards for introductory college mathematics before calculus. Retrieved October 15, 2002, from http://www.imacc.org/standards/.

Davies, I. K. (1981). Instructional technique. McGraw-Hill.

Dewi, N.R. (2013). Pengembangan Website Berorientasi Brain-Based Learning Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Mahasiswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika. UNY. ISBN: 978-979-16353-9-4.

Educational Testing Service. (2010). Intoduction to the Quantitative Reasoning Measure. United States.

Fauziah, A. (2010, June). Peningkatan kemampuan pemahaman dan pemecahan masalah matematik siswa SMP melalui strategi REACT. In Forum kependidikan (Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 1-13).

Howe, R. (1998). The AMS and mathematics education: The revision of the “NCTM standards†Notices of the AMS, 45(2), 243-247.

Mathematical Association of America. (2003). Guidelines for programs and departments in undergraduate mathematical sciences. Washinton, DC: Author.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Virginia: NCTM

Puadi, E. F. W., & Habibie, M. I. (2018). Implementasi PBL Berbantuan GSP Software Terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematik Siswa. IndoMath: Indonesia Mathematics Education, 1(1), 19-26.

Rismawati, R., & Komala, E. (2018). Penerapan Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa. IndoMath: Indonesia Mathematics Education, 1(2), 129-136.

Riyanto, B., & Siroj, R. A. (2014). Meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran dan prestasi matematika dengan pendekatan konstruktivisme pada siswa sekolah menengah atas. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2).

Sroyer, A. (2013). Penalaran Kuantitatif (Quantitative Reasoning) dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika. UNY. ISBN: 978-979-16353-9-4.

Sumarmo, U. (2013). Berpikir dan Disposisi Matematik serta Pembelajarannya: Kumpulan Makalah. Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika, UPI, Bandung.

Suryabrata, S. 1990. Psikologi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Widodo, S. A. (2015). Keefektivan Team Accelerated Instruction Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 6(2), 127-134.

Widodo, S. A. (2018). Selection of Learning Media Mathematics for Junior School Students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(1), 154-160.

Widodo, S. A., & Turmudi, T. (2017). Guardian Student Thinking Process in Resolving Issues Divergence. Journal of Education and Learning, 11(4), 432-438.

Yamin, M. (2007). Membelajarkan Siswa. Jakarta. Gaung Persada Pers.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-12

Issue

Section

Artikel

Citation Check