Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of Blended Learning on Mathematics Learning Based on Gender

Authors

  • Aina Azka University of Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka, Indonesia
  • Ayu Faradillah University of Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30738/indomath.v3i2.7864

Keywords:

Blended Learning, Perception, Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers, Rasch model

Abstract

The research aims to analyze pre-service teachers’ perceptions about the application of the blended learning model in mathematics learning. The total research subjects were 254 pre-service teachers from 12 different universities in Indonesia. Furthermore, this research method is a survey with a qualitative approach where data are analyzed using the Rasch Model (WinSteps). The instrument of this study was a questionnaire consisting of 20 statements and divided into four indicators. Based on the wright maps table on WinSteps, women pre-service teachers prefer the blended learning model in learning mathematics than men pre-service teachers. Meanwhile, when viewed in terms of grade, fourth year pre-service teachers like the application of the blended learning model the most. In addition, it is also known that the most disliked thing in understanding mathematics by using blended learning is the difficulty to access assignments online and it requires internet quotas.

References

Al-Furaih, S.A.A (2017). Perceptions of pre-service teachers on the design of a learning environment based on the seven principles of good practice. Springer Science+Business Media New York. Educ Inf Technol DOI 10.1007/s10639-017-9580-7

Bauk, S. I. (2015). Assessing Students’ Perception Of E-Learning In Blended Environment: An Experimental Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.393

Bostock, S.J., & Lizhi, W (2005) Gender in student online discussions, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42:1, 73-85, DOI: 10.1080/14703290500048978

Bibi, S., Jati, H. (2015). Efektivitas Model Blended Learning Terhadap Motivasi dan Tingkat Pemahaman Mahasiswa Mata Kuliah Algoritma dan Pemrograman. Pendidikan Vokasi. 5:1, 74-87

Bidder, C., Mogindol, H.S., Saibin, T.C., Andrew, S.A., & Naharu, N (2016) Students’ Perceptions of Blended Learning and Achievement. Envisioning the Future of Online Learning, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-0954-9

Borba, M.C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguilar, S.M (2016). Blended learning, e‑learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM - Mathematics Education 48:5 , 589-610 DOI 10.1007/s11858-016-0798-4

Chandrawati, Sri Rahayu. (2010). Pemanfaatan E-Learning dalam Pembelajaran. Cakrawala Kependidikan 8(2). 172–181.

Davidson, L.K.(2011). A 3-year experience implementing blended TBL: Active instructional methods can shift student attitudes to learning. Medical Teacher, 33(9),750-753. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.558948

Dang, Y., Zhang, Y., Ravindran, S., Osmonbekov, T. (2016). Examining Student Satisfaction and Gender Differences in Technology-Supported, Blended Learning. Journal of Information Systems Education, Vol. 27(2) Spring 2016

Edwards, A., & Alcock, A. (2010). Using Rasch analysis to identify uncharacteristic responses to undergraduate assessments. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 29(4), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrq008

Elyakim, N., Reychav, I., Offir, B., & McHaney, R (2017). Perceptions of Transactional Distance in Blended Learning Using Location-Based Mobile Devices. Journal of Educational Computing Research DOI: 10.1177/0735633117746169

Ellis, R.A., Pardo, A., & Han, F. (2016). Quality in blended learning environments – Significant differences in how students approach learning collaborations. Computers and Education, 102(March 2018), 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.006

E. Roberts (1999) In defense of the survey method: An illustration from a study of user information satisfaction. Accounting and Finance 39- (53-77) DOI: 10.1111/1467-629X.00017

E Simanjuntak, Y Hia, N Manurung (2020). The Differences in Students Learning Motivation Based On Gender Using Blended Learning Models of Mathematics Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1462 (2020) 012040 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1462/1/012040

Faradillah, A. & Hadi, W. (2020). Educators’ Perception of Blended Learning Models on Mathematics Learning. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 83-92

Francis, R., & Shannon, S.J.(2013). Engaging with blended learning to improve students’ learning outcomes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38:4, 359-369, DOI: : 10.1080/03043797.2013.766679

González-Gómez, F., Guardiola, J., Rodríguez, O.M., Alonso, M.A.M. (2012). Gender differences in e-learning satisfaction. Computers & Education 58 (2012) 283–290 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.017

Goktalay, S.B., & Ozdilek, Z (2010). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions about web 2.0 technologies. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 4737–4741. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.760

Hasrul, M. I, Suharianto, J., Lubis, R.A., Marbun, M. (2017) Revolusi Industri 4.0 dalam Dunia Pendidikan Dari Sisi Pembelajaran Berbasis Blended Learning. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Pendidikan Pascasarjana UNIMED

Hüseyin Bicen, Fezile Ozdamli & Hüseyin Uzunboylu (2014) Online and blended learning approach on instructional multimedia development courses in teacher education, Interactive Learning Environments, 22:4, 529-548, DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2012.682586

Hsu, L.L. (2011). Blended learning in ethics education: A survey of nursing students. Nursing Ethics ,18(3),418-430. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0969733011398097

Jillian J. Downing & Janet E. Dyment (2013) Teacher Educators' Readiness, Preparation, and Perceptions of Preparing Preservice Teachers in a Fully Online Environment: An Exploratory Study, The Teacher Educator, 48:2, 96-109, DOI: 10.1080/08878730.2012.760023

Kuo, Y., Belland, B.R., Schroder, K.E.E., & Walker, A.E. (2014). K-12 teachers’ perceptions of and their satisfaction with interaction type in blended learning environments, Distance Education, 35:3, 360-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.955265

Lamb, R. L., Annetta, L., & Meldrum, J. (2011). Measuring science interest: Rasch validation of the science interest survey. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9314-z

Lah Che, N.H., & Tasir, Z. (2018). Measuring Reliability and Validity of Questionnaire on Online Social Presence : A Rasch Model Analysis. Advanced Science Letters 24(11), 7900-7903 DOI: 10.1166/asl.2018.12452

Linacre, J.M. (2006). A User’s Guide to WINSTEPS. Chicago: Winsteps.com.

Limniou, M., & Smith,M. (2010). Teachers’ and students’ perspectives on teaching and learning through virtual learning environments. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(6),645-653. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/03043797.2010.505279

McSporran, M., Young S (2001) Does gender matter in online learning? ALT-J, 9:2, 3-15, DOI: 10.1080/0968776010090202

Mohamad, M.M., Sulaiman, N.L., Sern, L.C., Salleh, K.M (2015) Measuring the Validity and Reliability of Research Instruments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 204 ( 2015 ) 164 – 171 DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.129

Ogden, L. (2015). Student perceptions of the flipped classroom in college Algebra. Primus, 25(9), 782–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2015.1054011

Pibriana, D., Ricoida, D.I. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Penggunaan Internet Terhadap Minat Belajar Mahasiswa. Jatisi, 3(2) DOI: https://doi.org/10.35957/jatisi.v3i2.72

Roberts, E.S., (1999). In defence of the survey method: An illustration from a study of user information satisfaction. Accounting and Finance, 39 53-77 DOI: 10.1111/1467-629X.00017

Sad, S.N., & Göktas, O (2014). Preservice teachers’ perceptions about using mobile phones and laptops in education as mobile learning tools. British Journal of Educational Technology Vol 45 No 4 2014 606–618 doi:10.1111/bjet.12064

Sandi, G.(2005). Pengaruh Blended Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kimia Ditinjau dari Kemandirian Siswa. Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, Jilid 45, Nomor 3, hlm.241-251

Setiyani, R. (2010) Pemanfaatan Internet Sebagai Sumber Belajar. Dinamika Pendidikan Vol. V, No. 2 DOI: 10.15294/dp.v5i2.4921

Simanjuntak, E., Hia, Y., Manurung, N. (2020). The Differences in Students Learning Motivation Based On Gender Using Blended Learning Models of Mathematics Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1462/1/012040

Stern, M. J., Bilgen, I., & Dillman, D. A. (2014). The State of Survey Methodology: Challenges, Dilemmas, and New Frontiers in the Era of the Tailored Design. Field Methods, 26(3), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X13519561

Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. G. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Care and Research, 57(8), 1358–1362. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23108

Utami, Y. P., Alan, D., Cahyono, D., & Indonesia, U. T. (2020). Study at Home: Analisis Kesulitan Belajar. Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika Realistik (JI-MR) 1(1), 20–26.

Vaughan, N & Lawrence, K (2013). Investigating the role of mobile devices in a blended pre-service teacher education program. Canadian Journal of Higher Education Revue Canadienne d’enseignement supérieur 43(3), 56-77 DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-6343-5.ch006

Wai, C.C., & Seng, E.L.K (2013). Measuring the effectiveness of blended learning environment: A case study in Malaysia. Springer Science+Business Media New York.Educ Inf Technol DOI:10.1007/s10639-013-9293-5

Wibisono, S. (2014). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Validasi Fundamentalisme Agama bagi Responden Muslim. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia 3(3), 729-748

Downloads

Published

2020-07-28

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020)

Section

Artikel

Citation Check

License

Please find the rights and licenses in IndoMath: Indonesia Mathematics Education. By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) accept this policy.

1. License

The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). 

2. Author’s Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

3. User Rights

IndoMath spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, IndoMath permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and IndoMath on distributing works in the journal.

4. Rights of Authors

Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;

  • Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
  • The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
  • The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
  • The right to self-archive the article,
  • The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (IndoMath: Indonesia Mathematics Education).

5. Co-Authorship

If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. IndoMath will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. IndoMath will only communicate with the corresponding author.

6. Royalties

This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by IndoMath.

7. Miscellaneous

IndoMath will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. IndoMath editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.