Conceptual Understanding of Complex Analysis Number using Flipped Learning

Authors

  • Fariz Setyawan Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Siti Nur Rohmah Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30738/indomath.v4i1.9368

Keywords:

Flipped Learning, Handout, Complex Number

Abstract

Flipped Learning is one of the alternatives of teaching and learning approach in mathematics classroom. The objective of this study is exploring students’ conceptual understanding about complex number using flipped learning with handout. The subject of the study are the students in 5th semester students of mathematics education department in 2019/2020. The study used qualitative approach to describe the implementation of flipped learning.

There are 31,6% of 19 respondents give score very satisfied. This result then observed by using the test with all the students understand with the definition of complex numbers. Besides they can adapt their learning activity using flipped learning with complex analysis handout. As legibility aspect of the handout, there are 52,6% of the respondents gives score satisfied and 26,3% of the respondents are very satisfied. The score indicates that the flipped learning with handout helps students to understand about the complex number concepts.

Author Biography

Fariz Setyawan, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Scopus-ID

Google Scholar

 

References

Adi Widodo, S., Turmudi, & Afgani Dahlan, J. (2019). Can Sociomathematical Norms Be Developed with Learning Media? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1), 12005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012005

Ali, G. E., & Magalhaes, R. (2008). Barriers to implementing e-learning: a Kuwaiti case study. International Journal of Training and Development, 12(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2007.00294.x

Assareh, A., & Hosseini Bidokht, M. (2011). Barriers to E-teaching and E-learning. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 791–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.129

Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to Online Education in Schools during a SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), em0060. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7937

Childs, S., Blenkinsopp, E., Hall, A., & Walton, G. (2005). Effective e-learning for health professionals and students-barriers and their solutions. A systematic review of the literature-findings from the HeXL project. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 22(s2), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-3327.2005.00614.x

Davers, K. J., & Frankel, R. M. (2000). Study design in qualitative research--2: Sampling and data collection strategies - ProQuest. Education for Health, 13(2), 263–271. Retrieved from 10.1080/13576280050074543

Donnelly, R., & McSweeney, F. (2008). Applied e-learning and e-teaching in higher education. In Applied E-Learning and E-Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-814-7

Irfan, M., Kusumaningrum, B., Yulia, Y., & Widodo, S. A. (2020). CHALLENGES DURING THE PANDEMIC: USE OF E-LEARNING IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION. Infinity Journal, 9(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i2.p147-158

Kabilan, M. K., & Khan, M. A. (2012). Assessing pre-service English language teachers’ learning using e-portfolios: Benefits, challenges and competencies gained. Computers and Education, 58(4), 1007–1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.011

Laprairie, K. N., & Hinson, J. M. (2006). When Disaster Strikes, Move Your School Online. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(2), 209–214. https://doi.org/10.2190/d154-xk20-7264-5013

Michalsky, T., & Schechter, C. (2013). Preservice teachers’ capacity to teach self-regulated learning: Integrating learning from problems and learning from successes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.10.009

Miles,M.B. & Huberman, M. a. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). In Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). (Vol. 20). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1098-2140(99)80125-8

Nouri, J. (2016). The flipped classroom: for active, effective and increased learning – especially for low achievers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0032-z

Panasuk, R. M. (2010). Three Phase Ranking Framework for Assessing Conceptual Understanding in Algebra Using Multiple Representations. Education, 131(2), 235–257. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ930565&site=ehost-live%5Cnhttp://www.projectinnovation.biz/education_2006.html

Panasuk, R. M. (2011). Taxonomy for assessing conceptual understanding in Algebra using multiple representations. College Student Journal, 45(2), 219–232. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/885702121?accountid=25350

Pratama, L. D., & Ali, M. B. (2018). Game-Based Learning in Problem Solving Method : The Effects on S tudents ’ Achievement. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 2(2), 157–164.

Rahman, A., & Ahmar, A. (2016). Exploration of mathematics problem solving process based on the thinking level of students in junior high school. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(14), 7279–7285.

Setyawan, F. (2015). Conceptual Understanding Profile of LEOV Junior High School Students Based on Kolb’s Learning Style. International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education (ICSME), 61–63. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Setyawan, F., & Istiandaru, A. (2019). Implementasi Self Regulated Flipped Classroom pada Mata Kuliah Kalkulus. Journal of Medives : Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 3(1), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v3i1.699

Setyawan, F., Prasetyo, P. W., & Nurnugroho, B. A. (2020). Developing complex analysis textbook to enhance students’ critical thinking. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 5(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v5i1.8741

Siadaty, M., Gašević Dr, A., Jovanović, J., Pata, K., Milikić, N., Holocher-Ertl, T., Jeremić, Z., Ali, L., Giljanović, A., & Hatala, M. (2012). Self-regulated workplace learning: A pedagogical framework and semantic web-based environment. Educational Technology and Society, 15(4), 75–88.

Taha, M. H., Abdalla, M. E., Wadi, M., & Khalafalla, H. (2020). Curriculum delivery in Medical Education during an emergency: A guide based on the responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. MedEdPublish, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2020.000069.1

van Alten, D. C. D., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2019). Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. In Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003

Widodo, S., & Wahyudin. (2018). Selection of Learning Media Mathematics for Junior School Students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-02

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Artikel

Citation Check

License

Please find the rights and licenses in IndoMath: Indonesia Mathematics Education. By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) accept this policy.

1. License

The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). 

2. Author’s Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

3. User Rights

IndoMath spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, IndoMath permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and IndoMath on distributing works in the journal.

4. Rights of Authors

Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;

  • Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
  • The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
  • The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
  • The right to self-archive the article,
  • The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (IndoMath: Indonesia Mathematics Education).

5. Co-Authorship

If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. IndoMath will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. IndoMath will only communicate with the corresponding author.

6. Royalties

This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by IndoMath.

7. Miscellaneous

IndoMath will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. IndoMath editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.