Going beyond the EFL teachers’ beliefs on authentic assessment: Reframing the five-dimensional approach


  • Rozanah Katrina Herda Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Ima Widyastuti Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia
  • Maria Corazon Saturnina A Castro University of the Philippines, Philippines
  • Angga Damayanto Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia




Authentic assessment, Students’ performance, Five-dimensional framework


The 21st-century EFL teachers should focus more on students’ real performance, and authentic assessments become the most suitable assessment type that demonstrates students’ knowledge to perform real-world tasks in their real and meaningful context. The objectives of this qualitative study were to reveal the teachers’ beliefs in authentic assessment and propose an authentic assessment model adapted to Gulikers et al.'s five-dimensional framework. This study involved 37 EFL teachers in Indonesia from three education levels. The data were collected through a close-ended questionnaire made online and then analyzed using descriptive statistics. The findings of this study showed that teachers believed in the urgency of authentic assessment and the need to have a guideline that could be used to design appropriate authentic assessments. Additionally, by linking up to the need to design an ideal authentic assessment, the writers proposed a framework that not only focuses on the result but also considers the important elements in designing an authentic assessment that not many teachers know. Hopefully, the proposed framework will benefit educators, practitioners, and researchers who need new insight into the procedure to conduct an authentic assessment for their students.


Download data is not yet available.


Andrade, H. G. (1999). Student Self-Assessment: At the Intersection of Metacognition and Authentic Assessment.

Archibald, D., & Newmann, F. M. (1988). Beyond Standardized Testing: Assessing Authentic Academic Achievement in the Secondary School. 74. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED301587.pdf

Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., & Brown, C. (2014). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.819566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.819566

Aşık, G., & Erktin, E. (2019). Metacognitive experiences: Mediating the relationship between metacognitive knowledge and problem solving. Egitim ve Bilim, 44(197). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2019.7199

Bailey, K. M. (1998). Learning about language assessment: dilemmas, decisions, and directions. New York, NY: Heinle & Heinle Pub.

Barnes, N., Fives, H., & Dacey, C. M. (2015). Teachers’ Beliefs About Assessment. In H. Fives & M.G. Gill (Eds.), International Handbook of Research on Teachers’ Beliefs (pp. 284-300). New York: Routledge.

Cheng, A., & Tsang, A. (2022). Use and understanding of connectives: an embedded case study of ESL learners of different proficiency levels. Language Awareness, 31(2), 155-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1871912

Cheng, Liying & Fox, Janna. (2017). Assessment in the Language Classroom. UK: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46484-2

Dann, R. (2002). Promoting Assessment as Learning: Improving the Learning Process (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203470152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203470152

Davis, D. S., & Neitzel, C. (2011). A self-regulated learning perspective on middle grades classroom assessment. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(3), 202-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671003690148

Dawson, P., Carless, D., & Lee, P. P. W. (2021). Authentic feedback: supporting learners to engage in disciplinary feedback practices. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(2), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1769022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1769022

Dyson, B., Howley, D., & Shen, Y. (2021). ‘Being a team, working together, and being kind’: Primary students’ perspectives of cooperative learning's contribution to their social and emotional learning. Physical education and sport pedagogy, 26(2), 137-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1779683

Evans, W. D. (2022). Summative Evaluation. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Social Marketing (pp. 1-3). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14449-4_156-1

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Frey, B. B., Schmitt, V. L., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Defining authentic classroom assessment. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 17(2), 1–18.

Goodrich, H. W. (1997). Student self-assessment: At the intersection of metacognition and authentic assessment. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2854. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/student-self-assessment-at-intersection/docview/619243007/se-2?accountid=14166%0Ahttps://suny-alb.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/openurl/01SUNY_ALB/01SUNY_ALB:01SUNY_ALB?genre=dissertations+%26+theses&atitle=&author=

Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67–86. doi:10.1007/bf02504676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504676

Gulikers, J., Bastiaens, T., & Kirschner, P. (2006). Authentic assessment, student, and teacher perceptions: the practical value of the five‐dimensional framework. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 58(3), 337–357. doi:10.1080/13636820600955443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820600955443

Haerazi, H., Prayati, Z., & Vikasari, R. M. (2019). Practicing Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Approach To Improve Students' Reading Comprehension in Relation To Motivation. English Review: Journal of English Education, 8(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v8i1.2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v8i1.2011

Hamzah, H., Hamzah, M. I., & Zulkifli, H. (2022). Systematic Literature Review on the Elements of Metacognition-Based Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Teaching and Learning Modules. Sustainability, 14(2), 813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020813

Harlene, Wynne. (2007). Assessment of Learning. California: SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446214695

Harris, M. & McCann Paul. (1994). Handbooks for the English Classroom. Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann.

Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. (2009). The complexity of teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Tensions between the needs of schools and students. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 365-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903319745

Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 99–136. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066002099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066002099

Holen, A., & Sortland, B. (2022). The Teamwork Indicator–a feedback inventory for students in active group learning or team projects. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(2), 230-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1985435

Kendle, A., & Northcote, M. (2000). The struggle for balance in the use of quantitative and qualitative online assessment tasks. In Ascilite (Vol. 2002).

Koc, Selma, et al. (Eds.). (2015). Assessment in Online and Blended Learning Environments. USA: Information Age Publishing Inc.

Koh, K. H. (2017). Authentic Assessment. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.22

Luongo-Orlando, K. (2003). Authentic Assessment: Designing Performance-Based Task. Canada: Pembroke Publishers.

Mueller, John. (2018). Authentic Assessment Toolbox. North Central College. http://jfmueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/index.htm.

Muhtarom, H., & Kurniasih, D. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Abad 21 Terhadap Pembelajaran Sejarah Eropa. Bihari: Pendidikan Sejarah Dan Ilmu Sejarah, 3(2), 59–65.

Newmann, F. M., King, M. B., & Carmichael, D. L. (2007). Authentic Instruction and Assessments. Common Standards for Rigor and Relevance in Teaching Academic Subjects, 1–105. papers3://publication/uuid/F422F9A4-FEC1-4D92-889C-69694EC125F3.

Nicol, D., & McCallum, S. (2022). Making internal feedback explicit: exploiting the multiple comparisons that occur during peer review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(3), 424-443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1924620

Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. (2015). Penilaian Otentik dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa (2nd ed.). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Osborne, R., Dunne, E., & Farrand, P. (2013). Integrating technologies into "authentic" assessment design: an affordances approach. Vol 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.21986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.21986

Pate, P. E., Homestead, E., & McGinnis, K. (1993). Designing Rubrics for Authentic Assessment. Middle School Journal, 25(2), 25–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.1993.11495201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.1993.11495201

Puccio, G. J., Murdock, M. C., & Mance, M. (2005). Current developments in creative problem solving for organizations: A focus on thinking skills and styles. In Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving (Vol. 15, Issue 2, pp. 43–76).

Quansah, F. (2018). Traditional or Performance Assessment: What is the Right Way to Assessing Learners? Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(1), 21–24. www.iiste.org

Rennert-Ariev, P. (2005). A theoretical model for the authentic assessment of teaching. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 1–11.

Reynisdóttir, B. & J. (2016). The Efficacy of Authentic Assessment. May. https://skemman.is/bitstream/1946/24391/1/The Efficacy of Authentic Assessment_A Practical Approach.pdf.

Schultz, M. et al. (2022). Defining and measuring authentic assessment: a case study in the context of tertiary science. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(1), 77-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1887811

Selman, RD. Yohanes F. (2021). Proporsi Assessment for, as, dan of Learning dalam Pembelajaran. SMAS SANTU KLAUS WERANG. https://smasantuklauswerang.sch.id/read/14/proporsi-assessment-for-as-dan-of-learning-dalam-pembelajaran.

Susani, R. G. (2018). the Implementation of Authentic Assessment in Extensive Reading. International Journal of Education, 11(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v11i1.9113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v11i1.9113

Sutarto, H. P., & Jaedun, M. P. D. (2018). Authentic assessment competence of building construction teachers in indonesian vocational schools. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 10(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2018.10.01.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2018.10.01.008

Tawafak, R. M., Romli, A. M., & Alsinani, M. J. (2019). Student assessment feedback effectiveness model for enhancing teaching method and developing academic performance. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 15(3), 75-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2019070106

Tovani, Cris. (2011). So What Do They Really Know?: Assessment that Informs Teaching and Learning. USA: Stenhouse Publishers.

Ulker, V., & Yildiz, Y. (2021). The implementation of the authentic assessment in EFL classes in Erbil. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 8(2), 206-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v8i2p206

Yeo, J. (2011). Authentic assessment for creativity as a 21st century pedagogy. In K.H. Koh & J.Yeo (Eds.), Mastering the art of authentic assessments: From challenges to champions, 37-54. Singapore: Pearson Education South Asia.

Živkovic, Sladana. (2016). A Model of Critical Thinking as an Important Attribute for Success in the 21st Century. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 102–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.034




How to Cite

Herda, R. K., Widyastuti, I., Castro, M. C. S. A., & Damayanto, A. (2022). Going beyond the EFL teachers’ beliefs on authentic assessment: Reframing the five-dimensional approach. Tamansiswa International Journal in Education and Science (TIJES), 4(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.30738/tijes.v4i1.13346

Citation Check