Eight Months Later: A Family Case Study of L2 Acquisition of English Morphology

Authors

  • Yanyin Zhang The Australian National University, Australia
  • Ima Widyastuti Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30738/tijes.v1i2.7699

Abstract

This is a follow-up of our 2010 family case study (Zhang & Widyastuti, 2010)

in which we examined the acquisition of L2 English morphology by three members of an Indonesian family who had been living, working and studying in Australia for 12 months. In this paper, we will present a fresh set of data collected after a further 8 months in order to build a longitudinal picture of their L2 English morphology development. We will focus on the Mother and her 6-year-old Daughter, whose L2 English morphology, in 2010, was found to be at the beginning and post-beginning stages as measured by the ‘emergence criterion’ (Pienemann, 1998). We are interested in the extent of progress they had made since, and whether the L2 English grammatical morphology had been fully established by the end of their 20 months of residence in Australia. Our analysis of their speech data showed that while there was indeed progress, the progress was not comprehensive and the acquisition was incomplete. We discuss the finding from the perspective of immersion, home environment, and affective factors in L2 grammatical development, in particularly, in child L2 learners. The results of the study may inform language professionals and parents of young child L2 learners of the lengthy period required as well as the type of optimal L2 environment for their L2 grammatical development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

De Graaff, R., & Housen, A. (2009). Investigating Effects and Effectiveness of L2 Instruction. In M. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 726–753). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch38

Ekstrand, L. (1976). Age and Length of residence as Variables related to the Adjustment of Migrant Children, with Special Reference to Second Language Learning. In G. Nickel (Ed.), Proceedings of the fourth International Congress of Applied Linguistics (pp. 179–198). Stuttgart: Hochshulverlag.

Fathman, A. K. (1975). The Relationship between Age and Second language Learning Ability. Language Learning, 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1975.tb00244.x

Harley, B., & Wang, W. (1997). The Critical Period Hypothesis: Where are we now? In A. M. . De Groot & J. . Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Perspectives. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hyltenstam, K. (1992). Non-native Features of near-native speakers: On the ultimate attainment of Childhood L2 Learners. In R. . Harris (Ed.), Cognitive Processing in Bilinguals (pp. 351–368). Amsterdam: Elseview Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61505-8

Hyltenstem, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539–588). Oxford: Blackwell.

Krashen, S., Long, M., & Scarcella, R. (1979). Age, Rate, and Eventual Attainment in Second Language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 573–582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586451

Long, Michael. (1990). Maturational Constraints on Language Development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 251–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009165

Ortega, L. (2009). Sequences and processes in language learning. In Michael Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 81–105). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch6

Palloti, G. (2007). An operational definition of the emergence criterion. Applied Linguistics, 28, 361–382.

Pallotti, G. (2007). An operational definition of the emergence criterion. Applied Linguistics, 28, 361–382. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/applij/article-abstract/28/3/361/155911?redirectedFrom=fulltext DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm018

Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.15

Pienemann, M. (2005). An introduction to Processability Theory. In Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 1–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.30.03pie

Schmidt, R. (1983). Interaction, Acculturation, and the Acquisition of Communicative Competence: A Case Study of an Adult. In N. Wolfson & Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition (pp. 137–174). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Sun, H., Yin, B., Amsah, F., & O’Brien, B. A. (2018). Differential effects of internal and external factors in early bilingual vocabulary learning: the case of Singapore. Appl. Psycholinguist, 39, 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271641700039X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271641700039X

Zhang, Y., & Widyastuti, I. (2010). Acquisition of L2 english morphology: A family case study. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2104/aral1029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2104/aral1029

Downloads

Published

2020-04-28

How to Cite

Zhang, Y., & Widyastuti, I. (2020). Eight Months Later: A Family Case Study of L2 Acquisition of English Morphology. Tamansiswa International Journal in Education and Science (TIJES), 1(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.30738/tijes.v1i2.7699

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check