Eight Months Later: A Family Case Study of L2 Acquisition of English Morphology
This is a follow-up of our 2010 family case study (Zhang & Widyastuti, 2010)
in which we examined the acquisition of L2 English morphology by three members of an Indonesian family who had been living, working and studying in Australia for 12 months. In this paper, we will present a fresh set of data collected after a further 8 months in order to build a longitudinal picture of their L2 English morphology development. We will focus on the Mother and her 6-year-old Daughter, whose L2 English morphology, in 2010, was found to be at the beginning and post-beginning stages as measured by the â€˜emergence criterionâ€™ (Pienemann, 1998). We are interested in the extent of progress they had made since, and whether the L2 English grammatical morphology had been fully established by the end of their 20 months of residence in Australia. Our analysis of their speech data showed that while there was indeed progress, the progress was not comprehensive and the acquisition was incomplete. We discuss the finding from the perspective of immersion, home environment, and affective factors in L2 grammatical development, in particularly, in child L2 learners. The results of the study may inform language professionals and parents of young child L2 learners of the lengthy period required as well as the type of optimal L2 environment for their L2 grammatical development.
De Graaff, R., & Housen, A. (2009). Investigating Effects and Effectiveness of L2 Instruction. In M. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 726â€“753). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch38
Ekstrand, L. (1976). Age and Length of residence as Variables related to the Adjustment of Migrant Children, with Special Reference to Second Language Learning. In G. Nickel (Ed.), Proceedings of the fourth International Congress of Applied Linguistics (pp. 179â€“198). Stuttgart: Hochshulverlag.
Fathman, A. K. (1975). The Relationship between Age and Second language Learning Ability. Language Learning, 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1975.tb00244.x
Harley, B., & Wang, W. (1997). The Critical Period Hypothesis: Where are we now? In A. M. . De Groot & J. . Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Perspectives. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hyltenstam, K. (1992). Non-native Features of near-native speakers: On the ultimate attainment of Childhood L2 Learners. In R. . Harris (Ed.), Cognitive Processing in Bilinguals (pp. 351â€“368). Amsterdam: Elseview Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61505-8
Hyltenstem, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539â€“588). Oxford: Blackwell.
Krashen, S., Long, M., & Scarcella, R. (1979). Age, Rate, and Eventual Attainment in Second Language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 573â€“582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586451
Long, Michael. (1990). Maturational Constraints on Language Development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 251â€“285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009165
Ortega, L. (2009). Sequences and processes in language learning. In Michael Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 81â€“105). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch6
Palloti, G. (2007). An operational definition of the emergence criterion. Applied Linguistics, 28, 361â€“382.
Pallotti, G. (2007). An operational definition of the emergence criterion. Applied Linguistics, 28, 361â€“382. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/applij/article-abstract/28/3/361/155911?redirectedFrom=fulltext DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm018
Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.15
Pienemann, M. (2005). An introduction to Processability Theory. In Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 1â€“60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.30.03pie
Schmidt, R. (1983). Interaction, Acculturation, and the Acquisition of Communicative Competence: A Case Study of an Adult. In N. Wolfson & Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition (pp. 137â€“174). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Sun, H., Yin, B., Amsah, F., & Oâ€™Brien, B. A. (2018). Differential effects of internal and external factors in early bilingual vocabulary learning: the case of Singapore. Appl. Psycholinguist, 39, 383â€“411. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271641700039X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271641700039X
Zhang, Y., & Widyastuti, I. (2010). Acquisition of L2 english morphology: A family case study. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 1â€“17. https://doi.org/10.2104/aral1029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2104/aral1029
How to Cite
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.