Peer Review Process
The review process focuses on the contribution, novelty, originality, relevance, and presentation of the article. In the first step, the submitted manuscript is reviewed by an Editor. The submitted manuscript will be evaluated whether it is suitable for The Tamansiswa International Journal (TIJES) focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw and similarity score by using Turnitin.
The manuscript will be sent to at least two anonymous reviewers (Double Blind Review). Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses.
The suggested decision will be evaluated in an editorial board meeting. Afterward, the Editor will send the final decision to the corresponding author.
Utilizing feedback from the peer review process, the Editor will make a final publication decision. Decisions categories include:
- Reject - Rejected manuscripts will not be published and authors will not have the opportunity to resubmit a revised version of the manuscript to TIJES.
- Resubmit for Review– The submission needs to be re-worked, but with significant changes, it may be accepted. However, it will require a second round of review.
- Accept with Revisions - Manuscripts receiving an accept-pending-revisions decision will be published in TIJES under the condition that minor/major modifications are made. Revisions will be reviewed by an editor to ensure necessary updates are made prior to publication.
- Accept - Accepted manuscripts will be published in the current form with no further modifications required.
All correspondence concerning manuscripts should be directed to the Editor of TIJES and cc to firstname.lastname@example.org. The Editor will direct all correspondence to the corresponding author; the corresponding author is responsible for sharing communications with other authors. Beyond communication concerning the review, manuscripts accepted for publication may require additional correspondence to complete copyediting and layout editing.