SKEMA PENGEMBANGAN SUBJECT SPESIFIC PEDAGOGIC (SSP) BERBASIS ETHNOMATEMATIKA UNTUK MENINGKATKAN LITERASI MATEMATIKA SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR

Penulis

  • Meita Fitrianawati
  • Mukti Sintawati
  • Marsigit Marsigit
  • Endah Retnowati

Kata Kunci:

SSP, ethnomatematics, mathematical literacy.

Abstrak

The purpose of this research is to know the development of Subject Specific Pedagogic (SSP) based on ethnomatematics to increase the mathematics literacy of elementary school students. This research method is qualitative descriptive. The result of this research is scheme of SSP development based on ethnomatematics with research method of ADDIE based development that is; 1) Analysys: includes preliminary studies and needs analysis. 2), Design, Planning and development of product draft in the form of prototype of SSP product based on Ethnomatematics. 3) Development, Expert validation and revision. This stage is performed to produce a revised Ethnomatematic SSP based on expert input. Furthermore, the teaching materials are reviewed with experts in a FGD. 4) Implementation, Trial and revision. The trials were conducted as an effort to evaluate the implementation of learning using SSP based on Ethnomatematics for elementary students. 5) Evaluation disseminates and implements SSP based Ethnomatematics in SD learning, reporting and disseminating products through scientific meetings and journals, in collaboration with publishers for product socialization for commercial, and monitoring distribution and quality control. Output scheme in this research is SSP include Silabus, RPP, Textbook, Rating based on ethnomatematics that can increase the literacy of elementary school students.

Referensi

Bokar, A. J. (2015). Solving And Reflecting On Real-World Problems: Their Influences On Mathematicalliteracy And Engagement In The Eight Mathematical Practices. Thesis. The Faculty of the Patton College of Education and Human Resources Ohio University

D’Ambrosio, U. (1985). Ethnomathematics and its place in the history and pedagogy of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 5(1), 44-48.

D'Ambrosio. (1999). Literacy, Matheracy, and Technoracy: A Trivium for Today. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 1(2), 131-153.

Kramarski, Bracha. 2014.Enhancing Mathematical Literacy With The Use Of Metacognitive Guidance In Forum Discussion. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Vol 3, 169–176.

Laurens, Theresia. 2016. Analisis Etnomatematika Dan Penerapannya Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran. LEMMA: Research of Mathematics Education. 3 (1). 86-96.

OECD. 2013. PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do: Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science. (Volume 1). Paris: PISA- OECD Publishing.

Prayitno, S.M. & Wangid, M.N. Model Subject Specific Pedagogy Tematik Integratif Untuk Pengembangan Karakter Hormat Dan Tanggung Jawab Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter. 5 (2). 195-207

Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang Kemdikbud. 2012a. Determinants of Learning Outcomes TIMSS 2011: Final Report. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan

Putri, Linda Indiyarti. 2017. Eksplorasi Etnomatematika Kesenian Rebana Sebagai Sumber Belajar Matematika Pada Jenjang MI. Jurnal Ilmiah “PENDIDIKAN DASARâ€, 4 (1), 21-31.

Rachmawati, Inda. 2012. Eksplorasi Etnomatematika Masyarakat Sidoarjo. http://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/mathedunesa/article/view/249.

Rosa, M. & Orey, D. C. (2011). Ethnomathematics: the cultural aspects of mathematics. Revista Latinoamericana de Etnomatemática, 4(2). 32-54

Shirley, L. 2011. Using Ethnomathematics to find Multicultural Mathematical Connection: NCTM.

Ulfah, Amaliyah (2012) Pengembangan Subject Specific Pedagogy (Ssp) Ipa Untuk Mengembangkan Karakter Peserta Didik Kelas IV SD. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains. ISSN 2089-5828

UNESCO. 2014. Literacy for All. http://en.unesco.org/themes/literacy-all. diakses 12 Juni 2017

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2018-02-23