Manajemen Integrasi Kurikulum International Middle Year Curriculum (IMYC) dan Kurikulum Nasional dengan Perspektif Inklusi di SMP Tumbuh Yogyakarta
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research objectives include (1) Analyzing the management of the IMYC curriculum integration and the national curriculum with an inclusive perspective at SMP Tumbuh Yogyakarta; (2) Analyzing the role of educational inputs, processes, and outputs on the successful implementation of the IMYC curriculum integration and the national curriculum with an inclusive perspective at SMP Tumbuh Yogyakarta; (3) Analyzing the strength of integrating the IMYC curriculum and the national curriculum with an inclusion perspective at SMP Tumbuh Yogyakarta. This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study research design. This research was conducted in the international class of SMP Yogyakarta. Data was collected by means of in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation. The research subjects were the foundation administrator, head of school committee, principal, international curriculum coordinator, national curriculum coordinator, IMYC subject teachers, guidance and counseling teacher, and support teachers. The data analysis technique was carried out by data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions/verification. The results showed that: (1) SMP Yogyakarta implemented a curriculum management function in its management, starting from planning, organizing, implementing, and controlling the curriculum with various strategies, for example using the Integrated Curriculum model at the school level by integrating the national curriculum and IMYC and enriched with Cambridge curriculum specifically for Mathematics, Science and English. At the subject level using the Integrated Curriculum model for IMYC subjects and Separate Subject Curriculum for National Curriculum subjects; (2) The development of this curriculum integration model requires the role of educational inputs, processes, and outputs to support the achievement of curriculum success and the expected quality of education; (3) The advantages of this model are shown in the learning age which facilitates the learning needs of 11-14 years old, international thinking and international learning (International Mindedness and International Learning) insight, as well as the ability of students who are accustomed to diversity.
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Ansyar, M. 2015. Kurikulum – Hakikat, Fondasi, Desain dan Pengembangan. Jakarta: PT Fajar Interpratama mandiri.
Booth, T., Ainscow, M, Black-Hawkins, K, Vaughan, M. Dan Shaw, L. 2011. Index for Inclusion Developing Learning and Participation in School. Center for Studies on Inclusive education: UK.
Creswell, John W. 2015. Penelitian Kualitatif & Desain Riset. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Deni Koswara. 2011. Manajemen Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Fogarty, Robin. 2009. How to Integrate the Curricula. California: Corwin Press Inc.
Fieldwork Education. 2016. IMYC Implemenation File. London: WLC Group.
Gunawan, I & Djum Djum Noor Benty. 2017. Manajemen Pendidikan, Suatu
Pengantar Praktik, Bandung: Alfabeta.
Hamalik, O. 2017. Manajemen Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Handayani, I.M. 2013. Interaksi social anak berkebutuhan khusus di SDN 016/016 inklusif Samarinda: Studi kasus anak penyandang autisme. Ejournal Sosiatri-Sosiologi. Vol. 1, No. 1. Pp. 1-9.
Hall, T. E., Mayer, A., & Rose, D. H. 2012. An Introduction to Universal Design for Learning: Questions and Answers. In T. E . Hall, A. Mayer, & D. H. Rose (Eds.), Universal Design for Learning in the Classroom (pp. 1–8). New York: Guilford.
Irdamurti. 2019. Pendidikan Inklusif - Solusi Dalam Mendidik Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Mulyasa. 2004. Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi - Konsep, Karakter, dan Implementasi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyasa. 2014. Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Monthe, M. 2020. Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keberhasilan Kurikulum Ditinjau dari Sudut Manajerial. Ejournal Institut Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan. Vol. 14, No. 2: 269-279.
Nasution. S. 2008. Azas-azas Kurikulum. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Rusman. 2019. Manajemen Kurikulum. Jakarta: PT Fajar Interpratama mandiri.
Rahardjo, M. 2017. Studi Kasus Dalam Penelitian
Kualitatif: Konsep dan Prosedurnya. Makalah Universitas Islam Negeri
Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang. Program Pascasarana, 10-22.
Malang.
Rao, K., & Meo, G. 2016. Using universal design for learning to design standards-based lessons. SAGE Open, 6(4), 1–12.
Sugiono. 2019. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, R&D, dan Penelitian Pendidikan). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Evaluasi (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Utomo, J.T. 2015. Universal Design for Learning: Pengertian, Prinsip, dan
Penerapan. Makalah Seminar Nasional Teknologi Pendidikan UM.
Sa’ud, U.S. 2008. Inovasi Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta
Wahyudin. 2014. Manajemen Kurikulum. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Yuwono, I. 2017. Indikator Pendidikan Inklusi. Banjarmasin: Zifatama Jamawa.
