Analisis Higher Order and Thinking Skills (Hots) pada Instrumen Penilaian Pembelajaran Mahasiswa Program Profesi Guru (PPG) Daljab I
This study describes an assessment instrument based on Higher-Order and Thinking Skills (HOTS) made by students of the Teacher Profession Program (PPG) Daljab I batch 2021. This research is a descriptive study. The population of this study was 34 students of Daljab I Group I batch 2021, Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Yogyakarta. The research sample consisted of 9 students from the DIY Province. The data and data sources used are assessment instruments (questions) that are compiled while students are taking PPG and have been uploaded in the form of Learning Tools III. The data analysis technique uses Miles and Huberman's interactive analysis which includes data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions or verification. The results show that from 9 samples, 96 questions were obtained. Of the 96 items, 65 questions are HOTS (68.8%) and 31 questions are not HOTS (32.2%). The instrument questions that were made did not meet the HOTS due to the following reasons. 1) Questions that have not been HOTS are still below C3. 2) Some questions do not use a stimulus, but there are some HOTS questions that use a stimulus in the form of discourse, stories, and pictures; 2) Some questions have not been taken from the context of the real world/daily life; 3) some of the questions given do not contain critical, logical, metacognitive, and creative thinking processes. 4) Some of the questions have not applied the rules for multiple choice/explanation/filling questions.
Abdullah, A. H., Abidin, N. L. Z., & Ali, M. (2015). Analysis of students' errors in solving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) problems for the topic of fraction. Asian Social Science, 11(21), 133.
Anderson, Lorin W, dan David Krathwol. (2014). A Taxonomy for Learning, teaching, and Assesing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational, Abridge Edition 1st. Terjemahan Agung Prihantoro. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Ermawati dan Anang Purwianto. (2021). “Analisis Instrumen Penilaian Pembelajaran berbasis Higher Order And Thinking Skill (HOTS) Mahasiswa Program Profesi Guru (PPG) Daljab II 2020”. Prosiding Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pendidikan Karakter, 163-186.
Franco, A. R., Costa, P. S., Butler, H. A., & Almeida, L. S. (2017). Assessment of undergraduates’ real-world outcomes of critical thinking in everyday situations. Psychological reports, 120(4), 707-720.
Hairun Yahya. (2020). Evaluasi dan Penilaian dalam Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Budi Utama.
Tugiati, T., & Kuntoro, K. (2019, December). Penggunaan Ejaan Bahasa Indonesia Sesuai PUEBI Untuk Kepentingan Penulisan Perangkat Pembelajaran. In PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL LPPM UMP (pp. 325-327).
Tyas, M. A., Nurkamto, J., Marmanto, S., & Laksani, H. (2019, October). Developing higher order thinking skills (HOTS)–Based questions: Indonesian EFL teachers’ challenges. In Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Future of Education (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 52-63).
Narayanan, S., & Adithan, M. (2015). Analysis of question papers in engineering courses with respect to HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills). American Journal of Engineering Education (AJEE), 6(1), 1-10.
Yoke, S. K., Hasan, N. H., Jangga, R., & Kamal, S. N. I. M. (2015). Innovating with HOTS for the ESL Reading Class. English Language Teaching, 8(8), 10-17.
Uno, H. B dan Satria, K. (2014). Assesment Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sudjana, Nana. (2011). Penilaian Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Rosda Karya.
- 2021-08-18 (2)
- 2021-08-18 (1)
SOSIOHUMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
- Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal