EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MATEMATIS MAHASISWA PGSD
Kata Kunci:Problem-solving, critical thinking skills, math
This study is aimed to determine the effectiveness of problem-solving learning in terms of mathematic critical thinking skills of the student in PGSD Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa University. This study is quantitative research in the form of quasi-experiments with pretest-posttest control group research design. The population of this study is all students of the year 2016/2017 PGSD UST Yogyakarta. The experimental class and control class that taken at random are class C and class D. This research was conducted in April 2017 in PGSD UST Yogyakarta. The instrument of this study is the critical mathematical thinking skills test. instruments test were tested for validity using KMO and Bartlette's Test and reliability by using Cronbach's Alph. The data of the critical mathematical thinking test were analyzed using the SPSS program. Based on the hypothesis test, it can be concluded that the mathematics learning outcomes of students who are treated with problem-solving learning are as good as the students' mathematics learning outcomes treated with conventional learning. The results of mathematics learning students who have high critical thinking skills are better than the mathematics learning outcomes of students who have middle critical thinking skills is better than the low critical thinking skills. In the model of problem-solving and conventional learning, students' mathematics learning outcomes that have high critical thinking skills, medium and low are equally good. In categories of high, moderate, or low critical ability levels, student learning outcomes are equally good.
Depdiknas. 2006. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional No. 22 tahun 2006 tentang standar isi mata pelajaran matematika.
Ennis R H. 1985. Goals for A Critical Thinking Curriculum. In A.L. Costa (Ed.). Developing Minds: A Resource Book for Teaching Thinking. Virginia: Assosiation for Supervisions and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Erman Suherman, dkk. 2003. Strategi pembelajaran matematika kontemporer. Bandung: JICA Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Gokhale, A. A. 1995. Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking. Journal of Technology Education. Electrinic Journals.Volume 7, Number 1 Fall.
Krulick, S & Rudnick, J. A. 1995. A new sourcebook for teaching reasoning and problem solving in elementary school. London: A Simon & Schuster Company.
Langrehr, John. 2006. Thinking Skills. Edisi Pertama. Jakarta: Gramedia.
NCTM. 2000. Principles and standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA: NCTM, Inc.
Nitko, A. J. & Brookhart, S. M. 2011. Educational assessment of students,6th edition. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Polya, G. 1973. How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Romberg, T.A & Fennema, A. 2009. Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding. Mahwah, NJ: Taylor & Francis e-Library.
Trihendradi. 2013. Step by Step IBM SPSS 21: Analisis Data Statistik. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
Authors who publish with TRIHAYU agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the TRIHAYU right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in TRIHAYU.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in TRIHAYU.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).