Analysis of student activeness in mathematics learning with Merdeka Curriculum

Authors

  • Gabriela Alvina Maheswari Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia
  • Endah Saraswati Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia
  • Haniek Sri Pratini Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30738/union.v11i2.14132

Keywords:

Learning mathematics, Merdeka curriculum, Student activity

Abstract

The curriculum in Indonesia has gone through various changes which are expected to make education in Indonesia grow and educate the nation's children. Government developing a Merdeka Curriculum. The Merdeka Curriculum gives students the freedom to seek scientific information so that it fosters activeness in students in learning. The purpose of this research is to know and describe the steps to overcome students when learning mathematics. This Type of research is qualitative research using descriptive methods. This research was conducted at senior high school in Surakarta with the research subjects being students of class E4 at senior high school in Surakarta and having the research objective of knowing and describing things that make students active and inactive which make students during Mathematics Learning. Furthermore, the method of collecting data in this study is observation, interviews, and giving appointments to students. Analysis conducted by researchers namely data collection, analysis of data obtained, drawing conclusions. The results of this study are the activeness of students supported by the division of small groups to build student activity in the classroom. The enthusiasm of educators can build student activity such as giving games before learning takes place. Educators also deliver material in an interesting way to make students active to learn in the classroom.

References

Abdullah, M. Y., Bakar, N. R. A., & Mahbob, M. H. (2012). Student’s participation in classroom: What motivates them to speak up? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 516–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.199

Ahid, N., & Sufirmansyah, S. (2022). The Implementation of Merdeka Belajar Policy in East Java. Didaktika Religia, 10(1), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.30762/didaktika.v10i1.8

Bruner, J. S. (2009). The process of education. Harvard university press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvk12qst

Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701602748 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701602748

Carter, E. W., Moss, C. K., Asmus, J., Fesperman, E., Cooney, M., Brock, M. E., Lyons, G., Huber, H. B., & Vincent, L. B. (2015). Promoting inclusion, social connections, and learning through peer support arrangements. Teaching Exceptional Children, 48(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059915594784 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059915594784

Egeberg, H., McConney, A., & Price, A. (2021). Teachers’ views on effective classroom management: A mixed-methods investigation in Western Australian high schools. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 20, 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-020-09270-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-020-09270-w

Faiz, A., Pratama, A., & Kurniawaty, I. (2022). Pembelajaran berdiferensiasi dalam program guru penggerak pada modul 2.1 [Differentiated learning in the driving teacher program in module 2.1]. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 2846–2853. Retrieved from https://jbasic.org/index.php/basicedu/article/view/2504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2504

Gill, P., & Baillie, J. (2018). Interviews and focus groups in qualitative research: an update for the digital age. British Dental Journal, 225(7), 668–672. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.815

Hartas, D. (2015). Educational research and inquiry: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Ioannidou-Koutselini, M., & Patsalidou, F. (2015). Engaging school teachers and school principals in an action research in-service development as a means of pedagogical self-awareness. Educational Action Research, 23(2), 124–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2014.960531 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2014.960531

Irawati, D., Najili, H., Supiana, S., & Zaqiah, Q. Y. (2022). Merdeka Belajar Curriculum Innovation and Its Application in Education Units. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(2), 2506–2514. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v6i2.4603

Irons, A., & Elkington, S. (2021). Enhancing learning through formative assessment and feedback. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781138610514

Jackson, D., Fleming, J., & Rowe, A. (2019). Enabling the transfer of skills and knowledge across classroom and work contexts. Vocations and Learning, 12, 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-019-09224-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-019-09224-1

Khan, A., Egbue, O., Palkie, B., & Madden, J. (2017). Active learning: Engaging students to maximize learning in an online course. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 15(2), pp107-115. available online at www.ejel.org

Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389

Lestari, K. I., Arcana, I. N., Susetyo, A. E., & Kuncoro, K. S. (2022). Development of Online Learning Quiz and Educational Game Using Word Walls in Mathematics for Grade 10. INSANIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, 27(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v27i2.6924 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v27i2.6924

Lin-Siegler, X., Dweck, C. S., & Cohen, G. L. (2016). Instructional interventions that motivate classroom learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 295. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000124

Margono. (1997). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan [Educational Research Methods]. Rineka Cipta.

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif [Qualitative Research Methodology]. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyasa, H. E. (2021). Implementasi kurikulum 2013 revisi: dalam era industri 4.0 [Implementation of the revised 2013 curriculum: in the industrial era 4.0]. Bandung: Bumi Aksara.

Nafisah, A. D., Antika, D. H. W., Latiana, L., Formen, A., & Maronta, Y. (2022). Principal’s Leadership on “Sekolah Penggerak” Effectiveness in Improving the Quality of Education. Attractive: Innovative Education Journal, 4(2), 320–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.51278/aj.v4i2.456

Paolini, A. (2015). Enhancing Teaching Effectiveness and Student Learning Outcomes. Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 20–33. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1060429

Rotty, V. N. J., Kainde, Q., Pitoy, J. I., & Punuh, L. G. L. (2022). “Sekolah Penggerak” and Centers of Excellence. International Journal of Information Technology and Education, 1(4), 111–138. Retrieved from http://ijite.jredu.id/index.php/ijite/article/view/89

Rusticus, S. A., Pashootan, T., & Mah, A. (2023). What are the key elements of a positive learning environment? Perspectives from students and faculty. Learning Environments Research, 26(1), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09410-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09410-4

Sibagariang, D., Sihotang, H., & Murniarti, E. (2021). Peran guru penggerak dalam pendidikan merdeka belajar di indonesia [The role of driving teachers in independent learning education in Indonesia]. Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan, 14(2), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.51212/jdp.v14i2.53

Sileyew, K. J. (2019). Research design and methodology. Cyberspace, 1–12.

Simarmata, H. A., & Mayuni, I. (2023). Curriculum Reform In Indonesia: From Competency-Based To Freedom Of Learning. International Journal Of Pedagogical Novelty, 2(2), 1–13. Retrieved from https://jurnal.pustakagalerimandiri.co.id/index.php/ijopnov/article/view/519

Siregar, K. Y., & Mudjisusatyo, Y. (2022). The Influence of Independent Curriculum Development and Digitalization On Teacher’s Readiness in Teaching Elementary School. Proceeding of International Conference on Research of Educational Administration and Management (ICREAM), 6(1), 33–36. Retrieved from http://proceedings2.upi.edu/index.php/ICREAM/article/view/2736

Solheim, K., Ertesvåg, S. K., & Dalhaug Berg, G. (2018). How teachers can improve their classroom interaction with students: New findings from teachers themselves. Journal of Educational Change, 19(4), 511–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-018-9333-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-018-9333-4

Steinmayr, R., & Weidinger, A. (2019). The importance of students’ motivation for their academic achievement-replicating and excending previous findings. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01730 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01730

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D) [Educational Research Methods (Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D Approaches)] .Yogyakarta: Alfabeta.

Thomas, D. R. (2017). Feedback from research participants: are member checks useful in qualitative research? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 14(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2016.1219435 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2016.1219435

Trust, T. (2017). Motivation, empowerment, and innovation: Teachers’ beliefs about how participating in the Edmodo math subject community shapes teaching and learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(1–2), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1291317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1291317

Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226086644.001.0001

Watanabe, R., & Mcgaw, B. (2003). Student learning: Attitudes, engagement and strategies. Learning for Tomorrow’s World. First Results from PISA, 109–158. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/33918006.pdf

Wulandari, I. G. A. A. (2020). Implementation of the 2013 Curriculum Based on a Scientific Approach (Case Study at SD Cluster II Kintamani). International Journal of Elementary Education, 4(3), 422–430. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v4i3.28172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v4i3.28172

Zainuddin, Z., Shujahat, M., Haruna, H., & Chu, S. K. W. (2020). The role of gamified e-quizzes on student learning and engagement: An interactive gamification solution for a formative assessment system. Computers & Education, 145, 103729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103729 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103729

Downloads

Published

2023-07-24

How to Cite

Maheswari, G. A. ., Saraswati, E., & Pratini, H. S. . (2023). Analysis of student activeness in mathematics learning with Merdeka Curriculum. Union: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.30738/union.v11i2.14132

Issue

Section

Artikel

Citation Check