Analysis of students’ mathematical reasoning between different genders

A systematic literature review


  • Rahmat Kusharyadi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Dadang Juandi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia



ERIC, Gender, Mathematical reasoning ability, PRISMA, Scopus, Systematic literature review


The main purpose of this study was to examine existing studies related to mathematical reasoning skills based on gender differences using Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The following studies identify reasoning abilities based on gender differences. The review was carried out by carrying out several stages, namely the process of identification, screening, feasibility, inclusion, and data analysis on two livelihood machines, namely SCOPUS and ERIC. In reporting this study, the guidelines used were PRISMA guidelines. The data used was sorted by the specified criteria and this resulted in a total of 8 articles. Our findings identify that the study was conducted in three places: Indonesia, Sweden, and Turkey. Based on the findings of the study using three research designs, namely qualitative, mixed method, and quasi-experimental. The topics of the material used in this study are topics of geometry, algebra, and other branches of mathematics. The SLR also includes characteristics of reasoning abilities found by gender as well as the distribution of studies in terms of trends and countries.


Alghadari, F., Herman, T., & Prabawanto, S. (2020). Factors Affecting Senior High School Students to Solve Three-Dimensional Geometry Problems. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0590. DOI:

Asdarina, O., & Ridha, M. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Setara PISA Konten Geometri [Analysis of Students' Mathematical Reasoning Ability in Solving PISA Geometry Content Equivalent Problems]. Jurnal Numeracy, 7(1), 35–48. DOI:

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publication.

Erdem, E., & Soylu, Y. (2017). Age- And Gender-Related Change in Mathematical Reasoning Ability and Some Educational Suggestions. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(MRA), 116–127. Retrieved from

Henriques, A., & Martins, M. (2022). Mathematical reasoning in linear systems learning: a higher education exploratory teaching experiment with prospective teachers. Avances de Investigacion En Educacion Matematica, 21, 65–85. DOI:

Hewi, L., & Shaleh, M. (2020). Refleksi Hasil PISA (The Programme for International Student Assesment): Upaya Perbaikan Bertumpu pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini) [Reflection on the Results of PISA (The Program For International Student Assessment): Improvement Efforts Focus on Early Childhood Education)]. Jurnal Golden Age, 4(01), 30–41. DOI:

Isnani, I., Waluya, S. B., Rochmad, R., Sukestiyarno, S., Suyitno, A., & Aminah, N. (2020, April). How is Reasoning Ability in Learning Real Analysis?. In International Conference on Agriculture, Social Sciences, Education, Technology and Health (ICASSETH 2019) (pp. 253-256). Atlantis Press. DOI:

Jeannotte, D., & Kieran, C. (2017). A conceptual model of mathematical reasoning for school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 1–16. DOI:

Jesson, J. K., Matheson, L., & Lacey, F. M. (2011). Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. SAGE Publication.

João Pedro da, J. P., Marisa, Q., & Mata-Pereira. (2020). Como desenvolver o raciocínio matemático na sala de aula? Educação e Matemática, 156, 7–11. Retrieved from

Juandi, D. (2021). Heterogeneity of problem-based learning outcomes for improving mathematical competence: A systematic literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1722(1). DOI:

Juandi, D., & Tamur, M. (2020). Pengantar Analisis Meta. UPI PRESS.

Kadarisma, G., Nurjaman, A., Sari, I. P., & Amelia, R. (2019). Gender and mathematical reasoning ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4). DOI:

Karunika, A. M., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Fitrana, L. (2019). Profile of mathematical reasoning ability of female students based on self-efficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1265(1). DOI:

Kemdikbud. (2013). Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah [Basic and Secondary Education Content Standards]. Permendikbud Nomor 64 Tahun 2013.

Kitchenham, B. & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering, Technical Report EBSE 2007-001, Keele University and Durham University Joint Report.

Kurniati, D., Harimukti, R., & Jamil, N. A. (2016). Kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa SMP di Kabupaten Jember dalam menyelesaikan soal berstandar PISA [High-level thinking skills of junior high school students in Jember Regency in solving PISA standardized questions]. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 142–155. DOI:

Konita, M., Asikin, M., & Asih, T. S. N. (2019, February). Kemampuan penalaran matematis dalam model pembelajaran connecting, organizing, reflecting, extending (CORE) [Mathematical reasoning abilities in the connecting, organizing, reflecting, extending (CORE) learning model]. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika (Vol. 2, pp. 611-615). Retrieved from

Leder, G. C., & Forgasz, H. J. (2018). Measuring who counts: gender and mathematics assessment. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 50(4), 687–697. DOI:

Lee, V., Stiff, & Curcio, F. . (1999). Developing Mathematical Reasoning in Grades K-12. NCTM.

Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255–276. DOI:

Little, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Oxford University Press. DOI:

Mafada, A. A., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Fitriana, L. (2020). Identification of Mathematical Reasoning Ability in Solving Higher Order Thinking Skills Problems. 397(Icliqe 2019), 916–924. DOI:

NCTM. (2000). Principle and Standars for School Mathematics. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, 18(11).

Paré, G., Trudel, M. C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information and Management, 52(2), 183–199. DOI:

Ramadhani, R., Saragih, S., & Napitupulu, E. E. (2022). Exploration of Students’ Statistical Reasoning Ability in the Context of Ethnomathematics: A Study of the Rasch Model. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 14(1), 138–168.

Rokhima, W. A., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Fitriana, L. (2019). Mathematical reasoning of student in senior high school based on gender differences. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318(1). DOI:

Rosdiana, Budayasa, I. K., & Lukito, A. (2019). Pre-service primary school teachers’ mathematical reasoning skills from gender perspectives: A case study. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 1107–1122. DOI:

Subekti, F. E., Zaenuri, & Wardono. (2021). Students’ mathematical reasoning abilities on number sequence pattern material: Viewed from a gender perspective. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4). DOI:

Sukirwan, Darhim, D., & Herman, T. (2018). Analysis of students’ mathematical reasoning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1). DOI:

Sumpter, L. (2015). Investigating Upper Secondary School Teachers’ Conceptions: Is Mathematical Reasoning Considered Gendered? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 347–362. DOI:

Tohir, M. (2019). Hasil PISA Indonesia Tahun 2018 Turun Dibanding Tahun 2015 [Indonesia's PISA results for 2018 decreased compared to 2015]. Paper of Matematohir, 2(1), 1–2. DOI:

Triandini, E., Jayanatha, S., Indrawan, A., Werla Putra G., & Iswara, B. (2019). Systematic Literature Review Method for Identifying Platforms and Methods for Information System Development in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Information Systems, 1(2), 63. DOI:

Wahyuni, E. S., Susanto, & Hadi, A. F. (2019). Profile of the student’s mathematical reasoning ability in solving geometry problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1211(1). DOI:




How to Cite

Kusharyadi, R., & Juandi, D. (2023). Analysis of students’ mathematical reasoning between different genders: A systematic literature review. Union: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 339–347.




Citation Check