Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Aljabar Mahasiswa melalui Pembelajaran CLM Berbantuan Concept Mapping
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30738/union.v8i3.7855Keywords:
CLM, Concept Mapping, Pemahaman Konsep, AljabarAbstract
ABSTRAK
Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mendeskripsikan pembelajaran Concise Learning Method (CLM) berbantuan concept mapping, dan peningkatan kemampuan pemahaman konsep aljabar mahasiswa setelah pelaksanaannnya. Deskriptif kualitatif merupakan jenis penelitian ini, sedangkan mahasiswa pendidikan matematika Unipdu Jombang yang memprogram aljabar linier elementer II adalah subjek dalam penelitian. Lembar observasi dan soal tes pemahaman konsep merupakan alat untuk mengumpulkan data. Data dalam penelitian ini meliputi deskripsi hasil pengamatan terhadap keterlaksanaan pembelajaran dan deskripsi hasil tes pemahaman konsep matematis mahasiswa. Data tersebut kemudian dianalisis menggunakan interactive model. Dari hasil analisis diperoleh bahwa (1) Tahapan pembelajaran CLM berbantuan concept mapping meliputi mempelajari terlebih dahulu materi perkuliahan, berartisipasi aktif dalam perkuliahan, memproses informasi dalam bentuk concept mapping, mengerjakan latihan soal, dan menghasilkan ide baru, (2) kemampuan pemahaman konsep aljabar mahasiswa untuk setiap indikatornya mengalami peningkatan.
Â
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to describe Concise Learning Method (CLM) assisted with concept mapping and to increase the ability of students to understand algebraic concepts after the implementation. Qualitative descriptive is the type of this research, while the mathematics education students of Unipdu Jombang who program elementary linear algebra II are the subjects in the study. Observation sheets and concept understanding test questions are instruments used to collect data. Data ini this research consisted of a description of the observation of the implementation of learning and a description of the results of tests of students’ understanding of mathematical concepts. The data is then processed using interactive models. The results showed that (1) CLM learning stages assisted with concept mapping include previewing literature material, actively participating in lectures, processing information in the form of concept mapping, doing practice exercise, and produce new ideas, (2) the ability to understand student algebraic concepts for each indicator increased.
References
Amundsen, C., Weston, C., & McAlphine, L. (2008). Concept Mapping to Support University Academics’ Analysis of Course Content. Studies in Higher Education. Vol.33 No.6, 633-652.
Bender, D. & Craft, T. (2016). The Effect of Flexible small groups on math achievement in first grade. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 18(1), 1-9. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.4148/2470-6353.1022.
Brinkmann, A. (2003). Graphical Knowledge Display-Mind Mapping and Concept Mapping as Efficient Tools in Mathematics Education. Mathematics Education Review. No. 16, April: 35-48.
Brown, T. (2010). Truth and The Renewal of Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics Education. Educ Stud Math. 75: 329-343.
Davies, W.M. (2008). Concept Mapping, Mind Mapping and Argument Mapping: What are the Difference and Do They Matter? The University of Melbourne, Australia
Ernest, P. (2004). The philosophy of mathematics education. Oxford: Taylor & Francis.
Grevholm, B. (2008). Concept Maps As Research Tool In Mathematics Education. Concept Mapping: Connecting Educators Proc. Of the Third Int. Conference on Concept Mapping. Tallin, Estonia & Helsinki, Finland. http://cmc.ihmc.us/cmc2008papers/cmc2008-p301.pdf
Hafiz, M., Kadir & Fatra, M. (2017). Concept Mapping Learning Strategy to Enhance Students’ Mathematical Connection Ability. AIP Conference Proceedings 1848, 040006 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983944.
Hudojo, H. (2005). Pengembangan kurikulum dan pembelajaran matematika (Edisi Revisi II). Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang (UM Press).
Jin, H., & Wong, K.Y. (2015). Mapping conceptual understanding of algebraic concepts: An exploratory investigation involving grade 8 Chinese students. International Journal of science and mathematics education. Vol. 13 Issue 3, pp: 683-703.
Krasnic, T. (2011a). The Concise Learning Method For 21ST Century Students. (Online) (http://www.conciselearning.com/pdf/CLM%20eBook.pdf) diakses pada 3 Juni 2020.
Krasnic, T. (2011b). How to study with mind maps: The concise learning method. Florida: Concise Books Publishing LLC.
Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., Arredondo, D. E., Blackburn, G. J., Brandt, R. S., Moffett, C. A., Paynter, D. E., Pollock, J. E., & Whisler, J. S. (1997). Dimensions of learning: Trainer’s manual (2nd edition). Alexandria: ASCD.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
Orton, A. (2006). Learning Mathematics 3rd edition: Issues, Theory and Classroom Practice. Great Britain: MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall.
Reys, R., Lindquist, M.M., Lambdin, D. V. & Smith, N. L. (2009). Helping Children Learn Mathematics. United States of America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Serhan, D., Syam, M., & Aimdallal, Q. (2014). The Effect of Using Concept Maps on Advancing Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Euler Circuit. International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology. Vol 15, No.1, 31: 37.
Spradley, J. P. (2007). Metode etnografi. Yogyakarta: Tiara Kusuma.
Tim Penyusun. (2015). Pedoman Akademik FMIPA Unipdu Jombang. Jombang: FMIPA Unipdu.
Vitantri, C. A. (2017). Integrasi Concise Learning Method dengan Mind Mapping pada Pembelajaran Matematika di Perguruan Tinggi. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, Vol. 10 No. 2, Hal: 203-2021.
