Developing religious attitude instruments for elementary students

Authors

  • Amsiyah Amsiyah Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia
  • Felestin Felestin Institut Malgache des Techniques de Planification, Madagascar
  • Noor Faridha Universitas Mochammad Sroedji Jember, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30738/wd.v10i1.11441

Keywords:

Instrument development, attitude assessment, religious

Abstract

This study aims: (a) to develop an instrument for assessing the religious attitudes of elementary school students, and (b) to find out the results of the assessment of religious attitudes conducted on students using the instruments that have been made. This research is development research. Data analysis was carried out by proving content validity, construct validity and reliability. The results of the study: (a) the construction of religious assessment instruments includes indicators of worship obedience, gratitude behavior, praying before and after carrying out activities and tolerance in worship, (b) the results of proving content validity are 0.748, the KMO value of the last factor analysis is 0.853 with a significance of 0, 00, the proof of construct validity reduces the data twice in a limited trial and an expanded trial, from the initial number of items as many as 20 items and at the end 19 items in the final instrument which can form 6 new factors, the Cronbach Alpha reliability index is 0.908 which means the instrument is reliable, (c) the dissemination of the religious attitude assessment instrument was carried out with the subject of elementary school students in Wadaslintang District, the results showed that in general the religious attitudes of elementary school students in Wadaslintang District 22.86% belonged to the "Cultivated" category, 37.14% belonged to the " Developing”, 22.86% belonged to the “Starting to Look” category, and 17.14% belonged to the “ Not Seen.” 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ancok, D., Suroso, F. N., & Ardani, M. S. (2000). Psikologi Islami: Solusi Islam atas problem-problem psikologi. Pustaka Pelajar.

Arikunto, S. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen penelitian dan penilaian program. Pustaka Pelajar.

El-Menouar, Y. (2014). The five dimensions of Muslim religiosity. Results of an empirical study. Methods, Data, Analyses, 8(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2014.003

Fajaruddin, S., Retnawati, H., Wijaya, T. T., Ramadhan, S., & Prihatni, Y. (2021). Alhamdulillah, butir pengembangan instrumen penilaian artikel jurnal ilmiah dikatakan valid oleh para rater. Measurement In Educational Research (Meter), 1(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.33292/meter.v1i2.156

Fajaruddin, S., Retnawati, H., Yusron, E., & Sofyaningsih, V. (2021). Exploring the final examination test item characteristics of Pancasila and civic education. International Journal of Education and Learning, 3(3), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v3i3.435

Fenanlampir, A., & Faruq, M. M. (2015). Tes dan pengukuran dalam olahraga. Penerbit Andi.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis.

Hamzah, A. (2019). Metode penilaian dan pengembangan. CV Literasi Nusantara Abadi.

Kaye, J., & Raghavan, S. K. (2000). Spirituality in disability and illness: The psychology of religion and coping. In Theory, Research, Practice. Guilford.

Kunandar, K. (2013). Penilaian autentik (Penilaian hasil belajar peserta didik berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013): Suatu pendekatan praktis. Rajawali Pers.

Madjid, A., Sutoyo, D. A., & Shodiq, S. F. (2021). Academic procrastination among students: The influence of social support and resilience mediated by religious character . Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.34641

Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes. Mitrs Cendikia Offset.

Mardapi, D. (2016). Pengukuran, penilaian, dan evaluasi pendidikan (2nd ed.). Parama Publishing.

Mercer, J., & Clayton, D. (2012). Psikologi sosial. Erlangga.

Muzamiroh, M. L. (2013). Kupas tuntas Kurikulum 2013: Kelebihan dan kelemahan Kurikulum 2013. Penata Aksara.

Nugraha, Y. B. W. E. (2016). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian sikap tanggung jawab peserta didik pada mata pelajaran IPA SMP (Studi empirik di SMP Negeri 2 Playen Gunungkidul). Wiyata Dharma: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 4(2), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.30738/wd.v4i2.2278

Popham, W. J., & Baker, E. L. (2003). Teknik mengajar secara sistematis. Rineka Cipta.

Ratnawulan, E., & Rusdiana, R. (2015). Evaluasi pembelajaran. CV Pustaka Setia.

Retnawati, H. (2016). Validitas reliabilitas dan karakteristik butir. Parama Publishing.

Sam, A., Mbuju, D. K., & Nardi, M. (2020). Penilaian sikap siswa di sekolah dasar seturut Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Dasar, 1(1), 20–27. https://jlpdpgsd-unikastpaulus.id/JLPD/article/view/13

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan; pendidikan kuantitatif, kualitati. Alfabeta CV Bandung.

Supardi, S. (2015). Penilaian autentik. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Widarjono, A. (2010). Analisis statistika multivariat terapan. UPP STIM YKPN.

Widoyoko, E. P. (2012). Teknik penyusunan instrumen penelitian. Pustaka Pelajar.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-21

How to Cite

Amsiyah, A., Felestin, F., & Faridha, N. (2022). Developing religious attitude instruments for elementary students. Wiyata Dharma: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 10(1), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.30738/wd.v10i1.11441

Issue

Section

Artikel

Citation Check