Model CIPP (Contexs, Input, Process and Product) dalam evaluasi kinerja akademik Fakultas Dakwah UIN Prof. KH. Saifuddin Zuhri

Authors

  • Abdul Basit Universitas Islam Negeri Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri, Indonesia
  • Imam Alfi Universitas Islam Negeri Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri, Indonesia
  • Ageng Widodo Universitas Islam Negeri Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30738/wd.v10i1.12940

Keywords:

UIN SAIZU, Model CIPP, Evaluasi Program , Program Evaluted

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan evaluasi kinerja akademik fakultas Dakwah UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri, Purwokerto (UIN SAIZU) melalui model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, and Product). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan model evaluasi CIPP. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa  pertama, evaluasi kinerja akademik pada bagian Pendidikan dan pengajaran menunjukan bahwa dari tahun ke tahun baik dosen, tenaga kependidikan maupun mahasiswa fakultas dakwah mengalami peningkatan baik kualitas maupun kuantitas. Kedua, evaluasi kinerja bidang penelitian, semua riset melibatkan mahasiswa selain itu fakultas dakwah juga memiliki roadmap riset. Ketiga, dalam bidang pengabdian menunjukan Fakultas dakwah telah menetapkan peta pengabdian yang relevan dengan orientasi keilmuan yang ada di Fakultas dan program studi.

 

The CIPP (Context, Input, Process, and Product) model in evaluating the academic performance of the Faculty of Da'wah of UIN Prof. KH. Saifuddin Zuhri

 

Abstract: This study aims to explain the evaluation of the academic performance of the Faculty of Da'wah UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri, Purwokerto (UIN SAIZU) through the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, and Product) model. This research uses a qualitative method with a CIPP evaluation model. The results of this study show that first, the evaluation of academic performance in the Education and Teaching section shows that from year to year, both lecturers, educational staff, and students of the da'wah faculty have improved both in quality and quantity. Second, the evaluation of the performance of the research field, all research involves students, besides the da'wah faculty also has a research roadmap. Third, in the field of service, it shows that the Faculty of Da'wah has established a map of service that is relevant to the scientific orientation in the Faculty and study programs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldapit, E., & Suharjana, S. (2019). CIPP evaluation model for the coaching program of running athletes. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v1i2.10

Alkin, M. C. (1969). Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of instructional programs. Symposium on Problems in the Evaluation of Instruction.

Arikunto, S. (2014). Evaluasi program pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. A. (2009). Evaluasi program pendidikan (2nd ed.). Bumi Aksara.

Bettoncelli, G., Blasi, F., Brusasco, V., Centanni, S., Corrado, A., De Benedetto, F., De Michele, F., Di Maria, G. U., Donner, C. F., Falcone, F., Mereu, C., Nardini, S., Pasqua, F., Polverino, M., Rossi, A., & Sanguinetti, C. M. (2014). The clinical and integrated management of COPD. An official document of AIMAR (Interdisciplinary Association for Research in Lung Disease), AIPO (Italian Association of Hospital Pulmonologists), SIMER (Italian Society of Respiratory Medicine), SIMG (Italian Society of General Medicine). Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine, 9(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-6958-9-25

Divayana, D. G. H., Sanjaya, D. B., Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., & Sudirtha, I. G. (2017). CIPP evaluation model based on mobile phone in evaluating the use of blended learning platforms at vocational schools in Bali. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 95(9), 1983–1995. http://www.jatit.org/volumes/Vol95No9/10Vol95No9.pdf

Haryadi, C. (2019). Evaluasi keberhasilan pelaksanaan program adiwiyata. Wiyata Dharma: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.30738/wd.v7i2.3694

Irwan, M. (2017). Evaluasi program pelatihan keterampilan mengolah limbah kertas semen pada PKBM Cahaya Kota Binjai. JPPM (Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat), 4(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.21831/jppm.v4i2.14100

Jaedun, A. (2010). Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi sebagai sumber belajar alternatif. In Diklat pemanfaatan sumber belajar yang kreatif.

Mahmudi, I. (2011). CIPP: Suatu model evaluasi program pendidikan. Journal of Pesantren Education At-Ta’dib, 6(1), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v6i1.551

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 73 Tahun 2013 Tentang Penerapan Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesia Bidang Pendidikan Tinggi, Pub. L. No. 73 (2013).

Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia nomor 44 tahun 2015 tentang standar nasional pendidikan tinggi, Pub. L. No. 44 (2015).

Owen, J. M. (1993). Programme evaluation: Forms and Approaches. St. Leonards: Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd.

Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2012 Tentang Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesi, (2012).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pendidikan Tinggi, (2012).

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia nomor 32 tahun 2013, tentang perubahan atas peraturan pemerintah nomor 19 tahun 2005 tentang standar nasional pendidikan, Pub. L. No. 32, Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia (2013).

Rahayuningsih, R. S., Fajaruddin, S., & Manggalasari, L. C. (2018). The implementation of total quality management in vocational high schools. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 1(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v1i1.20

Rostan, M., & Vaira, M. (2011). Structuring the field of excellence BT - Questioning excellence in higher education: Policies, experiences and challenges in national and comparative perspective. In M. Rostan & M. Vaira (Eds.), Questioning Excellence in Higher Education. Higher Education Research in the 21st Century Series, (pp. 57–74). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-642-7_4

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2001). Evaluation models. New Directions for Evaluation, 2001(89), 7–98.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In International Handbook of Educational Evaluation (pp. 31–62). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4

Ummah, S., & Ariyanto, A. (2019). CIPP Model for program evaluation at madrasah tsanawiyah. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 2(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.36597/jelp.v2i2.4962

Downloads

Published

2022-10-20

How to Cite

Basit, A., Alfi, I. ., & Widodo, A. (2022). Model CIPP (Contexs, Input, Process and Product) dalam evaluasi kinerja akademik Fakultas Dakwah UIN Prof. KH. Saifuddin Zuhri. Wiyata Dharma: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 10(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.30738/wd.v10i1.12940

Issue

Section

Artikel

Citation Check