Development of instruments for measuring critical attitudes of junior high school students

Authors

  • Ratna Dynawati Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia
  • Ari Setiawan Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia
  • Bounmy Phalychan Champasak University, Lao People's Democratic Republic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30738/wd.v10i2.13724

Keywords:

Instrument Development, Measurement, Critical Attitude, Social Media Information

Abstract

The goals of this study were: (1) to find out how teachers evaluate the critical attitudes of junior high school students toward information on social media; (2) to find out how a proper and standardized instrument for measuring the critical attitudes of junior high school students toward information on social media is made; and (3) to find out the criticality value of junior high school students after being measured using a valid and reliable instrument. This research is a type of research and development (R&D), and it uses the 10 steps of Djemari Mardapi's affective instrument development procedure. Based on the results of the study, the following conclusions can be made: (1) Teachers haven't been using proper and standard tools to measure students' critical attitudes so far. (2) The critical attitude instrument for junior high school students was made by putting together a hypothetical model with five indicators, having an expert validate it, giving it a readability test, and doing a lot of testing with 48 valid instruments (MSA > 0.5) with a reliability of 0.800 and a lot of testing with 38 valid instruments (MSA > 0.5) with a reliability of 0.813. (3) The results of measuring the critical attitudes of 32 students at Sentolo 4 Junior High School (SMP Negeri 4 Sentolo) obtained the following results: very high critical attitude values of 15.63%, high critical attitude values of 28.13%, low critical attitude values of 37.50%, and very low critical attitude values of 18.75%. The results of these tests show that most junior high school students are still not very critical.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arikunto, S. (2015). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (Revisi). Bumi Aksara.

Astuti, N. D. (2022). Instrumen pengukuran sikap bernalar kritis pada peserta didik kelas X SMK. Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa.

Azwar, S. (2015). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Pustaka Pelajar.

Buchari, A. (2018). Peran guru dalam pengelolaan pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmiah Iqra’, 12(2), 106. https://doi.org/10.30984/jii.v12i2.897

Djaali, D., & Muljono, P. (2008). Pengukuran dalam bidang pendidikan. Grasindo.

Ennis, R. H. (1987). Critical thinking. Pretice Hall, Inc.

Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. Theory Into Practice, 32(3), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543594

Erikson, E. H. (2010). Childhood and society. WW Norton & Company.

Hassoubah, Z. I. (2008). Developing creative and critical thinking skills : cara berpikir kreatif dan kritis. Yayasan Nuansa Cendikia.

Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2017). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues. Nelson Education.

Kemp, S. (2022). Digital 2022: Indonesia. Datareportal. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2022-indonesia

Kennedy, M., Fisher, M. B., & Ennis, R. H. (1991). Critical thinking: Literature review and needed research. In L. Idol & B. F. Jones (Eds.), Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform (pp. 11–40). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Keraf, A. S., & Dua, M. (2001). Ilmu pengetahuan sebuah tinjauan filosofis. Kanisius.

Kerlinger, F. N. (2006). Asas-asas penelitian behavioral (trans. L.R). Gadjah Mada Universty Press.

Kurniawati, E., Al Siddiq, I. H., & Idris, I. (2020). E-commerce opportunities in the 4.0 era innovative entrepreneurship management development. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21(1), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2020.21.1.15

Mardapi, D. (2018). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan non-tes (A. Setiawan (ed.)). Parama Publishing.

Mawardi, M. (2019). Rambu-rambu penyusunan skala sikap model Likert untuk mengukur sikap siswa. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 9(3), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2019.v9.i3.p292-304

Mulyana, E. H., Hamdu, G., & Nurzakiah F, F. (2016). Pengembangan penilaian sikap dengan menggunakan analisis video pelaksanaan pembelajaran berbasis konteks. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains. https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/snps/article/view/9860

Ningrum, D. P. (2019). Pemanfaatan media sosial terhadap fenomena “Hoax” di kalangan remaja milenial (studi di SMAN 1, Kecamatan Pleret, Bantul, Yogyakarta). Jurnal Ilmiah Padma Sri Kreshna, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.37631/psk.v1i1.35

Purwanto, N. (2014). Evaluasi hasil belajar (4th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Putri, T. K. W., Wicaksono, Y. P., Li, Y., Trabelsi, O., & Elareshi, M. (2022). Efektivitas pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia berbasis media Youtube pada masa pembelajaran online. Caraka: Jurnal Ilmu Kebahasaan, Kesastraan, Dan Pembelajarannya, 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.30738/caraka.v9i1.13514

Rahmawan, D., Mahameruaji, J. N., & Janitra, P. A. (2018). Potensi Youtube sebagai media edukasi bagi anak muda. Edulib, 8(8). https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/edulib/article/view/11267

Rakhmat, J. (2013). Psikologi komunikasi. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sappaile, B. I. (2007). Konsep instrumen penelitian pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 13(66), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v13i66.356

Sobur, A. (2003). Psikologi umum. Pustaka Setia.

Sudjana, N. (2010). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono, S. (2019). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Alfabeta.

Techataweewan, W., & Prasertsin, U. (2018). Development of digital literacy indicators for Thai undergraduate students using mixed method research. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.07.001

Tenriawaru, A., & Jumarniati, J. (2016). Pengembangan instrumen sikap peserta didik pada mata pelajaran matematika. Pedagogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.30605/pedagogy.v1i1.400

Thohirin, T. (2021). Sidang kasus babi ngepet Depok ungkap kronologi Adam bikin onar. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20211102183401-20-715709/sidang-kasus-babi-ngepet-depok-ungkap-kronologi-adam-bikin-onar.

Waleleng, G. J., & Himpong, M. D. (2022). Sosialisasi pemanfaatan internet sehat dan aman pada anak remaja di Kelurahan Taas Kecamatan Tikala Kota Manado. ACTA DIURNA KOMUNIKASI, 4(4). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/actadiurnakomunikasi/article/view/43614

Widoyoko, E. P. (2020). Teknik penyusunan instrumen penelitian. Pustaka Pelajar.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-08

How to Cite

Dynawati, R., Setiawan, A., & Phalychan, B. (2022). Development of instruments for measuring critical attitudes of junior high school students. Wiyata Dharma: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 10(2), 128–140. https://doi.org/10.30738/wd.v10i2.13724

Issue

Section

Artikel

Citation Check